Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>,
	colins@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: patch for printing 64-bit values in i386 registers; STABS format
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EA9FDDF.8070205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030426030534.GA26304@nevyn.them.org>


> I'm afraid I don't understand, and I still don't see your reasoning
> against this approach.

It isn't necessary, just like register convertible and register 
raw/virtual size; .... that go before it, also were not necessary.  And 
now all these years later, GDB is still yet to expunge.

Until someone does the right think - add support for values scattered 
across registers and memory - hacks should be confined to architecture 
specific code.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-26  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-25  0:27 Colin Smith
2003-04-25  2:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-25 22:18   ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-25 22:24     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26  3:05       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-26  3:20         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26  3:32           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-26  3:39             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26  8:25               ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-04-27  3:47                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 15:22                 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-28 16:09                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 16:14                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 16:15                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 16:37                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 19:26                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 22:47                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29  2:15                               ` re-ordered i386 regcache Andrew Cagney
2003-04-29  4:45                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 14:30                                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-29 15:08                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 15:25                                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-30  3:37                                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-30 14:28                                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-30 18:20                                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 20:06                       ` Re: patch for printing 64-bit values in i386 registers; STABS format Colin Smith
2003-04-28  0:51         ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-28 16:18           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 17:30             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-25  0:29 Colin Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EA9FDDF.8070205@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=colins@google.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox