From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix arm-netbsd build error
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C0F31A-7085-4722-93B6-062DF7A10E58@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPTJ0XGE8aF9UYteRTYHAExAMhHSYBdFCtSMXc__=RwCEOpHhA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 7983 bytes --]
> On 11 Feb 2020, at 23:34, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:55 PM Christian Biesinger
> <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> The floating point register interface has changed to this:
>> https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/sys/arch/arm/include/reg.h
>>
>> It now uses VFP instead of FPA registers. This patch updates
>> arm-nbsd-nat.c accordingly.
>>
>> Tested by compiling on arm-netbsd on qemu. For actually testing, there
>> seems to be something missing as "info registers" only shows FPA
>> registers and no VFP ones. I am still investigating why this is;
>> please let me know if you know. However, I think this is still good
>> to check in as-is.
>
> Hm... this is perhaps because arm_netbsd_nat_target does not implement
> read_description; if it returned arm_read_description
> (ARM_FP_TYPE_VFPV2) this may work?
>
Yes, looks like netbsd isnât using any target description functionality.
I suspect the code is getting into arm_gdbarch_init() with a null tdesc,
and then using the AUTO setting. But thatâs just a guess.
Implementing read_description as you suggest should help. However,
read_description should probably do HWCAP checking similar to the
arm_linux_nat_target and arm_fbsd_nat_target versions.
Without that, Iâd worry that your patch below might start writing off the
end of the regcache that had been allocated for a fewer number of registers.
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2020-02-11 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
>>
>> * arm-nbsd-nat.c (arm_supply_fparegset): Rename to...
>> (arm_supply_vfpregset): ...this, and update to use VFP registers.
>> (fetch_fp_register): Update.
>> (fetch_fp_regs): Update.
>> (store_fp_register): Update.
>> (store_fp_regs): Update.
>> (fetch_elfcore_registers): Update.
>> ---
>> gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c b/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
>> index 11afc289c3..8027f54dfe 100644
>> --- a/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
>> +++ b/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
>> @@ -65,15 +65,13 @@ arm_supply_gregset (struct regcache *regcache, struct reg *gregset)
>> }
>>
>> static void
>> -arm_supply_fparegset (struct regcache *regcache, struct fpreg *fparegset)
>> +arm_supply_vfpregset (struct regcache *regcache, struct fpreg *fpregset)
>> {
>> - int regno;
>> -
>> - for (regno = ARM_F0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_F7_REGNUM; regno++)
>> - regcache->raw_supply (regno,
>> - (char *) &fparegset->fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
>> + struct vfpreg &vfp = fpregset->fpr_vfp;
>> + for (int regno = ARM_D0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM; regno++)
>> + regcache->raw_supply (regno, (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
>>
>> - regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPS_REGNUM, (char *) &fparegset->fpr_fpsr);
>> + regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
>> }
>>
>> static void
>> @@ -147,10 +145,10 @@ static void
>> fetch_fp_register (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>> {
>> struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> + (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>>
>> - ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> - (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>> + struct vfpreg &vfp = inferior_fp_registers.fpr_vfp;
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> {
>> @@ -158,18 +156,15 @@ fetch_fp_register (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - switch (regno)
>> + if (regno == ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM)
>> + regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
>> + else if (regno >= ARM_D0_REGNUM && regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM)
>> {
>> - case ARM_FPS_REGNUM:
>> - regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
>> - (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
>> - break;
>> -
>> - default:
>> - regcache->raw_supply
>> - (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
>> - break;
>> + regcache->raw_supply (regno,
>> + (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
>> }
>> + else
>> + warning (_("Invalid register number."));
>> }
>>
>> static void
>> @@ -188,7 +183,7 @@ fetch_fp_regs (struct regcache *regcache)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - arm_supply_fparegset (regcache, &inferior_fp_registers);
>> + arm_supply_vfpregset (regcache, &inferior_fp_registers);
>> }
>>
>> void
>> @@ -327,10 +322,9 @@ static void
>> store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>> {
>> struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> - (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>> + int ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> + (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>> + struct vfpreg &vfp = inferior_fp_registers.fpr_vfp;
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> {
>> @@ -338,18 +332,15 @@ store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - switch (regno)
>> + if (regno == ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM)
>> + regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
>> + else if (regno >= ARM_D0_REGNUM && regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM)
>> {
>> - case ARM_FPS_REGNUM:
>> - regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
>> - (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
>> - break;
>> -
>> - default:
>> - regcache->raw_collect
>> - (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
>> - break;
>> + regcache->raw_collect (regno,
>> + (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
>> }
>> + else
>> + warning (_("Invalid register number."));
>>
>> ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>> @@ -361,20 +352,17 @@ store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>> static void
>> store_fp_regs (const struct regcache *regcache)
>> {
>> - struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
>> - int ret;
>> - int regno;
>> + struct fpreg fpregs;
>>
>> -
>> - for (regno = ARM_F0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_F7_REGNUM; regno++)
>> + for (int regno = ARM_D0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM; regno++)
>> regcache->raw_collect
>> - (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
>> + (regno, (char *) &fpregs.fpr_vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
>>
>> - regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
>> - (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
>> + regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM,
>> + (char *) &fpregs.fpr_vfp.vfp_fpscr);
>>
>> - ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> - (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
>> + int ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
>> + (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &fpregs, 0);
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> warning (_("unable to store floating-point registers"));
>> @@ -427,7 +415,7 @@ fetch_elfcore_registers (struct regcache *regcache,
>> /* The memcpy may be unnecessary, but we can't really be sure
>> of the alignment of the data in the core file. */
>> memcpy (&fparegset, core_reg_sect, sizeof (fparegset));
>> - arm_supply_fparegset (regcache, &fparegset);
>> + arm_supply_vfpregset (regcache, &fparegset);
>> }
>> break;
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.0.225.g125e21ebc7-goog
>>
\x16º&Öéj×!zÊÞ¶êç×®5ãÉb²Ö«r\x18\x1dnr\x17¬
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200211225503.32992-1-cbiesinger@google.com>
2020-02-11 23:35 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 13:30 ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2020-02-12 16:29 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 17:10 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-12 17:17 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-12 23:28 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 23:43 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-13 0:01 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-28 13:18 ` [PATCH v2] Fix arm-netbsd build error: convert from FPA to VFP Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-28 14:35 ` Alan Hayward
2020-02-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
[not found] ` <ECBA936B-BF56-4F49-9C57-35E0F29D560E@arm.com>
2020-03-02 17:29 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-03-02 17:32 ` Kamil Rytarowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C0F31A-7085-4722-93B6-062DF7A10E58@arm.com \
--to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox