From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Fix arm-netbsd build error: convert from FPA to VFP
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228131824.153805-1-cbiesinger@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6227c001-8ae8-cb5e-f987-fc01499e5ba7@gmx.com>
[Fixes the issue pointed out by Alan based on code by Kamil.
This took way longer than it should have due to an unrelated regression,
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2020-02/msg01038.html]
The floating point register interface has changed to this:
https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/sys/arch/arm/include/reg.h
It now uses VFP instead of FPA registers. This patch updates
arm-nbsd-nat.c accordingly.
Also implements read_description so that these registers are correctly
printed by "info registers" et al.
Tested by compiling & running on arm-netbsd on qemu.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-02-11 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
* arm-nbsd-nat.c (arm_supply_fparegset): Rename to...
(arm_supply_vfpregset): ...this, and update to use VFP registers.
(fetch_fp_register): Update.
(fetch_fp_regs): Update.
(store_fp_register): Update.
(store_fp_regs): Update.
(arm_netbsd_nat_target::read_description): New function.
(fetch_elfcore_registers): Update.
---
gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c b/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
index 11afc289c3..2e7d840adf 100644
--- a/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/arm-nbsd-nat.c
@@ -26,10 +26,12 @@
#include "target.h"
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
+#include <sys/sysctl.h>
#include <machine/reg.h>
#include <machine/frame.h>
#include "arm-tdep.h"
+#include "aarch32-tdep.h"
#include "inf-ptrace.h"
class arm_netbsd_nat_target final : public inf_ptrace_target
@@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ public:
/* Add our register access methods. */
void fetch_registers (struct regcache *, int) override;
void store_registers (struct regcache *, int) override;
+ const struct target_desc *read_description () override;
};
static arm_netbsd_nat_target the_arm_netbsd_nat_target;
@@ -65,15 +68,13 @@ arm_supply_gregset (struct regcache *regcache, struct reg *gregset)
}
static void
-arm_supply_fparegset (struct regcache *regcache, struct fpreg *fparegset)
+arm_supply_vfpregset (struct regcache *regcache, struct fpreg *fpregset)
{
- int regno;
-
- for (regno = ARM_F0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_F7_REGNUM; regno++)
- regcache->raw_supply (regno,
- (char *) &fparegset->fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
+ struct vfpreg &vfp = fpregset->fpr_vfp;
+ for (int regno = ARM_D0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM; regno++)
+ regcache->raw_supply (regno, (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
- regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPS_REGNUM, (char *) &fparegset->fpr_fpsr);
+ regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
}
static void
@@ -147,10 +148,10 @@ static void
fetch_fp_register (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
{
struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
- int ret;
+ int ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
+ (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
- ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
- (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
+ struct vfpreg &vfp = inferior_fp_registers.fpr_vfp;
if (ret < 0)
{
@@ -158,18 +159,15 @@ fetch_fp_register (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
return;
}
- switch (regno)
+ if (regno == ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM)
+ regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
+ else if (regno >= ARM_D0_REGNUM && regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM)
{
- case ARM_FPS_REGNUM:
- regcache->raw_supply (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
- (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
- break;
-
- default:
- regcache->raw_supply
- (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
- break;
+ regcache->raw_supply (regno,
+ (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
}
+ else
+ warning (_("Invalid register number."));
}
static void
@@ -188,7 +186,7 @@ fetch_fp_regs (struct regcache *regcache)
return;
}
- arm_supply_fparegset (regcache, &inferior_fp_registers);
+ arm_supply_vfpregset (regcache, &inferior_fp_registers);
}
void
@@ -327,10 +325,9 @@ static void
store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
{
struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
- int ret;
-
- ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
- (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
+ int ret = ptrace (PT_GETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
+ (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
+ struct vfpreg &vfp = inferior_fp_registers.fpr_vfp;
if (ret < 0)
{
@@ -338,18 +335,15 @@ store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
return;
}
- switch (regno)
+ if (regno == ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM)
+ regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM, (char *) &vfp.vfp_fpscr);
+ else if (regno >= ARM_D0_REGNUM && regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM)
{
- case ARM_FPS_REGNUM:
- regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
- (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
- break;
-
- default:
- regcache->raw_collect
- (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
- break;
+ regcache->raw_collect (regno,
+ (char *) &vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
}
+ else
+ warning (_("Invalid register number."));
ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
(PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
@@ -361,20 +355,17 @@ store_fp_register (const struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
static void
store_fp_regs (const struct regcache *regcache)
{
- struct fpreg inferior_fp_registers;
- int ret;
- int regno;
+ struct fpreg fpregs;
-
- for (regno = ARM_F0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_F7_REGNUM; regno++)
+ for (int regno = ARM_D0_REGNUM; regno <= ARM_D31_REGNUM; regno++)
regcache->raw_collect
- (regno, (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr[regno - ARM_F0_REGNUM]);
+ (regno, (char *) &fpregs.fpr_vfp.vfp_regs[regno - ARM_D0_REGNUM]);
- regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPS_REGNUM,
- (char *) &inferior_fp_registers.fpr_fpsr);
+ regcache->raw_collect (ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM,
+ (char *) &fpregs.fpr_vfp.vfp_fpscr);
- ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
- (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &inferior_fp_registers, 0);
+ int ret = ptrace (PT_SETFPREGS, regcache->ptid ().pid (),
+ (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) &fpregs, 0);
if (ret < 0)
warning (_("unable to store floating-point registers"));
@@ -397,6 +388,23 @@ arm_netbsd_nat_target::store_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
}
}
+const struct target_desc *
+arm_netbsd_nat_target::read_description ()
+{
+ int flag;
+ size_t len = sizeof (flag);
+
+ if (sysctlbyname("machdep.fpu_present", &flag, &len, NULL, 0) != 0
+ || !flag)
+ return arm_read_description (ARM_FP_TYPE_NONE);
+
+ len = sizeof(flag);
+ if (sysctlbyname("machdep.neon_present", &flag, &len, NULL, 0) == 0 && flag)
+ return aarch32_read_description ();
+
+ return arm_read_description (ARM_FP_TYPE_VFPV3);
+}
+
static void
fetch_elfcore_registers (struct regcache *regcache,
gdb_byte *core_reg_sect, unsigned core_reg_size,
@@ -420,15 +428,11 @@ fetch_elfcore_registers (struct regcache *regcache,
break;
case 2:
- if (core_reg_size != sizeof (struct fpreg))
- warning (_("wrong size of FPA register set in core file"));
- else
- {
- /* The memcpy may be unnecessary, but we can't really be sure
- of the alignment of the data in the core file. */
- memcpy (&fparegset, core_reg_sect, sizeof (fparegset));
- arm_supply_fparegset (regcache, &fparegset);
- }
+ /* cbiesinger/2020-02-12 -- as far as I can tell, ARM/NetBSD does
+ not write any floating point registers into the core file (tested
+ with NetBSD 9.1_RC1). When it does, this block will need to read them,
+ and the arm-netbsd gdbarch will need a core_read_description function
+ to return the right description for them. */
break;
default:
--
2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200211225503.32992-1-cbiesinger@google.com>
2020-02-11 23:35 ` [PATCH] Fix arm-netbsd build error Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 13:30 ` Alan Hayward
2020-02-12 16:29 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 17:10 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-12 17:17 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-12 23:28 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-12 23:43 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-13 0:01 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-02-28 13:18 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches [this message]
2020-02-28 14:35 ` [PATCH v2] Fix arm-netbsd build error: convert from FPA to VFP Alan Hayward
2020-02-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
[not found] ` <ECBA936B-BF56-4F49-9C57-35E0F29D560E@arm.com>
2020-03-02 17:29 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-03-02 17:32 ` Kamil Rytarowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200228131824.153805-1-cbiesinger@google.com \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox