* [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
@ 2015-10-15 14:36 Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-15 16:22 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2015-10-15 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Aleksandar Ristovski
In case of running gdbserver with --multi, if a nat file
removes a process, current_thread may remain set to now
freed 'process' entry.
This may lead to wrong operation or a crash.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* inferiors.c (remove_process): Reset current_thread if its
associated process gets removed.
---
gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
index 21f45fa..4688a44 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
@@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ remove_process (struct process_info *process)
{
clear_symbol_cache (&process->symbol_cache);
free_all_breakpoints (process);
+ if (current_thread && get_thread_process (current_thread) == process)
+ {
+ remove_thread (current_thread);
+ current_thread = NULL;
+ }
remove_inferior (&all_processes, &process->entry);
free (process);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
2015-10-15 14:36 [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2015-10-15 16:22 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-16 13:40 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2015-10-15 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski, gdb-patches
On 10/15/2015 03:36 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> In case of running gdbserver with --multi, if a nat file
> removes a process, current_thread may remain set to now
> freed 'process' entry.
>
> This may lead to wrong operation or a crash.
>
> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
> * inferiors.c (remove_process): Reset current_thread if its
> associated process gets removed.
> ---
> gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
> index 21f45fa..4688a44 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ remove_process (struct process_info *process)
> {
> clear_symbol_cache (&process->symbol_cache);
> free_all_breakpoints (process);
> + if (current_thread && get_thread_process (current_thread) == process)
> + {
> + remove_thread (current_thread);
> + current_thread = NULL;
> + }
This seems very papering-over-something-else.
- I could argue that current_thread = NULL would be better done
inside remove_thread than here, since what you say would happen
as well if the current thread is removed, even without removing
the process.
- And then, if we remove the current thread, why not remove others?
AFAICS, other targets remove threads from within target_mourn, as that
way they have a chance of clearing auxiliary info associated with
the threads (the inferior_target_data()), and then some call
clear_inferiors, which also clears current_thread.
> remove_inferior (&all_processes, &process->entry);
> free (process);
> }
>
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
2015-10-15 16:22 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2015-10-16 13:40 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-16 14:04 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2015-10-16 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2197 bytes --]
On 15-10-15 12:22 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 03:36 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>> In case of running gdbserver with --multi, if a nat file
>> removes a process, current_thread may remain set to now
>> freed 'process' entry.
>>
>> This may lead to wrong operation or a crash.
>>
>> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
>> * inferiors.c (remove_process): Reset current_thread if its
>> associated process gets removed.
>> ---
>> gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
>> index 21f45fa..4688a44 100644
>> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
>> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
>> @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ remove_process (struct process_info *process)
>> {
>> clear_symbol_cache (&process->symbol_cache);
>> free_all_breakpoints (process);
>> + if (current_thread && get_thread_process (current_thread) == process)
>> + {
>> + remove_thread (current_thread);
>> + current_thread = NULL;
>> + }
>
> This seems very papering-over-something-else.
>
> - I could argue that current_thread = NULL would be better done
> inside remove_thread than here, since what you say would happen
> as well if the current thread is removed, even without removing
> the process.
Agree.
>
> - And then, if we remove the current thread, why not remove others?
>
True again.
> AFAICS, other targets remove threads from within target_mourn, as that
> way they have a chance of clearing auxiliary info associated with
> the threads (the inferior_target_data()), and then some call
> clear_inferiors, which also clears current_thread.
clear_inferiors wouldn't work if we want to keep other inferiors.
>
>> remove_inferior (&all_processes, &process->entry);
>> free (process);
>> }
>>
Ok, if this is intended use, to first remove threads then it will work.
I still think resetting current_thread in remove_thread is in order.
Assert in remove_process would help people like me.
Attached is another version as a proposal, though now not strictly
necessary. The patch did not show any regressions testing on a
native-gdbserver target board. (GNU/Linux x86_64)
Thanks,
Aleksandar
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gdbserver-Reset-current_thread-when-the-thread-is-re.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-gdbserver-Reset-current_thread-when-the-thread-is-re.patch", Size: 2136 bytes --]
From 51f95e4541852b0d6a10cf931bdeeada1a9dd99c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:23:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when the thread is removed.
Reset current_thread and make sure 'remove_process' is used
after all associated threads have been removed first.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* inferiors.c (thread_pid_matches_callback): New function.
(find_thread_process): New function.
(remove_thread): Reset current_thread.
(remove_process): Assert threads have been removed first.
---
gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
index 21f45fa..fe47a72 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
@@ -141,6 +141,21 @@ find_thread_ptid (ptid_t ptid)
return (struct thread_info *) find_inferior_id (&all_threads, ptid);
}
+static int
+thread_pid_matches_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *args)
+{
+ return (ptid_get_pid (entry->id) == *(pid_t *)args);
+}
+
+static struct thread_info *
+find_thread_process (const struct process_info *const process)
+{
+ pid_t pid = ptid_get_pid (ptid_of (process));
+
+ return (struct thread_info *)
+ find_inferior (&all_threads, thread_pid_matches_callback, &pid);
+}
+
ptid_t
gdb_id_to_thread_id (ptid_t gdb_id)
{
@@ -166,6 +181,8 @@ remove_thread (struct thread_info *thread)
discard_queued_stop_replies (ptid_of (thread));
remove_inferior (&all_threads, (struct inferior_list_entry *) thread);
free_one_thread (&thread->entry);
+ if (current_thread == thread)
+ current_thread = NULL;
}
/* Return a pointer to the first inferior in LIST, or NULL if there isn't one.
@@ -291,6 +308,7 @@ remove_process (struct process_info *process)
{
clear_symbol_cache (&process->symbol_cache);
free_all_breakpoints (process);
+ gdb_assert (find_thread_process (process) == NULL);
remove_inferior (&all_processes, &process->entry);
free (process);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
2015-10-16 13:40 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2015-10-16 14:04 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-16 14:48 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2015-10-16 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski, gdb-patches
On 10/16/2015 02:40 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> +static int
> +thread_pid_matches_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *args)
> +{
...
> +static struct thread_info *
> +find_thread_process (const struct process_info *const process)
> +{
OK with intro comments added.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
2015-10-16 14:04 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2015-10-16 14:48 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-16 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2015-10-16 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves, gdb-patches
On 15-10-16 10:04 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 02:40 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>
>> +static int
>> +thread_pid_matches_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *args)
>> +{
>
> ...
>
>> +static struct thread_info *
>> +find_thread_process (const struct process_info *const process)
>> +{
>
> OK with intro comments added.
>
Like this?
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
index fe47a72..72a3ef1 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.c
@@ -141,12 +141,18 @@ find_thread_ptid (ptid_t ptid)
return (struct thread_info *) find_inferior_id (&all_threads, ptid);
}
+/* Predicate function for matching thread entry's pid to the given
+ pid value passed by address in ARGS. */
+
static int
thread_pid_matches_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *args)
{
return (ptid_get_pid (entry->id) == *(pid_t *)args);
}
+/* Find a thread associated with the given PROCESS, or NULL if no
+ such thread exists. */
+
static struct thread_info *
find_thread_process (const struct process_info *const process)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed.
2015-10-16 14:48 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2015-10-16 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2015-10-16 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski, gdb-patches
On 10/16/2015 03:48 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> On 15-10-16 10:04 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> OK with intro comments added.
>>
>
> Like this?
That's perfect. Please push.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-16 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-15 14:36 [PATCH] gdbserver: Reset current_thread when its process is removed Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-15 16:22 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-16 13:40 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-16 14:04 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-16 14:48 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2015-10-16 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox