From: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gdb: add disable-docs option
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56050C9B.3050000@openwide.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22T=r=hUUrAdr2WK_Xb=Bywwvx8svvNUP-2MHqSwf78KrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Thanks for your reply!
Le 24/09/2015 23:46, Doug Evans a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 06 Sep 2015 11:37, Romain Naour wrote:
>>> If makeinfo is not found in the system then the missing
>>> script is used to warn the user.
>>>
>>> Before commit e30465112ed4c6320dd19107302057a5f7712cf2 the missing
>>> script returned 0 after printing the message.
>>>
>>> Now, missing return 127 (command not found) to the Makefile and
>>> the build fail.
>>>
>>> As suggested [1], add a new option to disable the documentation.
>>
>> aren't info pages shipped as part of the release ? so even if makeinfo isn't
>> available, it doesn't matter as the pages aren't regenerated on the user's
>> system. maybe you're applying patches to the source that cause the docs to be
>> regenerated ? if that's the case, i think disabling the docs entirely is the
>> wrong way to go. instead it should be skipping the regeneration step and
>> installing the pages that already exist. alternatively, you can adjust your
>> build to update the timestamps of the generated files so the build won't try
>> to regenerate them.
>> -mike
>
> Agreed.
>
> Sometimes releases have gone out with bad timestamps which need to be
> fixed, but yeah there should be no need to disable doc generation.
>
Actually, I really want to disable the documentation entirely since all
documentation installed by packages (like gdb) are automatically removed from
the generated filesystem at the end of the build (see [1] and [2]).
Until gdb 7.8, ac_cv_prog_MAKEINFO=missing was used to workaround the build
issue when makeinfo was missing. But it's not enough since gdb 7.9.
Best regards,
Romain Naour
[1] http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#faq-no-doc-on-target
[2] http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/Makefile#n559
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1441532245-23124-1-git-send-email-romain.naour@openwide.fr>
2015-09-24 20:10 ` Romain Naour
2015-09-24 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2015-09-24 21:47 ` Doug Evans
2015-09-25 8:58 ` Romain Naour [this message]
2015-09-25 11:50 ` Simon Marchi
2015-09-25 13:53 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56050C9B.3050000@openwide.fr \
--to=romain.naour@openwide.fr \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=yao.qi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox