Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 07/24/2015 03:30 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 July 2015 at 11:26, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 08:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:14:47 -0300
>>>> From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
>>>> CC: <keiths@redhat.com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, <yunlian@google.com>
>>>>
>>>> Do we consider the fact that mingw32 (and maybe other non-GNU) builds
>>>> have been broken since this libiberty sync a blocker/critical issue?
>>>
>>> It's not broken: I've built the pretest with that problem in it, and
>>> it does build, albeit with a (harmless) warning.
>>>
>>>> Last we heard of it was here...
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00654.html
>>>
>>> The release tarball builds without -Werror, so this warning is just a
>>> warning, since asprintf does return an int.
>>
>> It's also a varargs function though; varargs functions
>> must have a visible prototype.  I wouldn't be surprised if this
>> resulted in a crash/corruption on some targets/abis.
>>
>> ISTR seeing a patch for this, but I can't find it now.
>>
>> Did I just imagine it?
>>
> 
> Do you mean: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00570.html
> 

Ah, yes.  Looks good to me, though bfd is owned by binutils; the
patch needs to be sent to the binutils@ list.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves