From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63652 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 14:37:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 63639 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 14:37:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:37:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A9C96DD; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6OEbn8X009593; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:37:50 -0400 Message-ID: <55B24DBD.1050305@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:37:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iain Buclaw CC: Eli Zaretskii , Luis Machado , Joel Brobecker , GDB Patches , keiths@redhat.com, Jan Kratochvil , Yunlian Jiang Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update? References: <20150717175328.GA15874@adacore.com> <55A94617.1040701@codesourcery.com> <83r3o661z4.fsf@gnu.org> <55B204B8.9030101@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00704.txt.bz2 On 07/24/2015 03:30 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 24 July 2015 at 11:26, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 07/17/2015 08:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:14:47 -0300 >>>> From: Luis Machado >>>> CC: , Jan Kratochvil , >>>> >>>> Do we consider the fact that mingw32 (and maybe other non-GNU) builds >>>> have been broken since this libiberty sync a blocker/critical issue? >>> >>> It's not broken: I've built the pretest with that problem in it, and >>> it does build, albeit with a (harmless) warning. >>> >>>> Last we heard of it was here... >>>> >>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00654.html >>> >>> The release tarball builds without -Werror, so this warning is just a >>> warning, since asprintf does return an int. >> >> It's also a varargs function though; varargs functions >> must have a visible prototype. I wouldn't be surprised if this >> resulted in a crash/corruption on some targets/abis. >> >> ISTR seeing a patch for this, but I can't find it now. >> >> Did I just imagine it? >> > > Do you mean: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00570.html > Ah, yes. Looks good to me, though bfd is owned by binutils; the patch needs to be sent to the binutils@ list. Thanks, Pedro Alves