From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
keiths@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com,
yunlian@google.com
Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B204B8.9030101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83r3o661z4.fsf@gnu.org>
On 07/17/2015 08:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:14:47 -0300
>> From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
>> CC: <keiths@redhat.com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, <yunlian@google.com>
>>
>> Do we consider the fact that mingw32 (and maybe other non-GNU) builds
>> have been broken since this libiberty sync a blocker/critical issue?
>
> It's not broken: I've built the pretest with that problem in it, and
> it does build, albeit with a (harmless) warning.
>
>> Last we heard of it was here...
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00654.html
>
> The release tarball builds without -Werror, so this warning is just a
> warning, since asprintf does return an int.
It's also a varargs function though; varargs functions
must have a visible prototype. I wouldn't be surprised if this
resulted in a crash/corruption on some targets/abis.
ISTR seeing a patch for this, but I can't find it now.
Did I just imagine it?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-17 17:53 Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 18:14 ` Luis Machado
2015-07-17 18:32 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 18:38 ` Luis Machado
2015-07-17 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-07-17 20:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 20:57 ` Luis Machado
2015-07-20 10:13 ` Iain Buclaw
2015-07-21 17:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 19:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-07-17 19:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-07-24 9:26 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-07-24 14:31 ` Iain Buclaw
2015-07-24 14:37 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-17 18:25 ` Keith Seitz
2015-07-17 18:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-17 18:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 20:15 ` Simon Marchi
2015-07-17 20:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-17 21:00 ` Simon Marchi
2015-07-17 20:24 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-07-20 10:06 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-21 17:11 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B204B8.9030101@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=yunlian@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox