From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Be lazy about refreshing the windows in tui_show_frame_info (PR tui/13378)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5592A753.4030004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435631532-32504-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
On 06/30/2015 03:32 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This revised patch makes sure that tui_set_locator_info returns 1 when the
> locator is first constructed, just in case none of the later checks trigger
> for some reason.
I have a couple questions below, but I'm fine with this approach.
> @@ -302,21 +306,36 @@ tui_set_locator_info (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> {
> struct tui_gen_win_info *locator = tui_locator_win_info_ptr ();
> struct tui_locator_element *element;
> + int locator_changed_p = 0;
>
> /* Allocate the locator content if necessary. */
> if (locator->content_size <= 0)
> {
> locator->content = tui_alloc_content (1, LOCATOR_WIN);
> locator->content_size = 1;
> + locator_changed_p = 1;
> }
>
> element = &locator->content[0]->which_element.locator;
> +
> + if (procname != NULL)
> + locator_changed_p |= strncmp (element->proc_name, procname,
> + MAX_LOCATOR_ELEMENT_LEN) != 0;
Can't element->proc_name be NULL here?
For the string fields, do we also need to compare
whether we go from NULL <-> non-NULL ?
locator_changed_p |= ((fullname == NULL) != (element->full_name == NULL));
etc.?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-27 2:35 [PATCH 1/3] Correctly initialize the TUI locator window Patrick Palka
2015-06-27 2:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] Be lazy about refreshing the windows in tui_show_frame_info (PR tui/13378) Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 2:32 ` [PATCH] " Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 14:27 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-06-30 14:45 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 15:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 15:15 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 17:26 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-27 2:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] Replace TUI's select_frame hook " Patrick Palka
2015-06-27 2:50 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 9:32 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 12:16 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 12:37 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 14:08 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 14:54 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 14:56 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 15:12 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 15:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 16:40 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 17:07 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 17:11 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 17:32 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 17:49 ` Patrick Palka
2015-07-01 12:40 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 13:23 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-30 14:03 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-30 8:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] Correctly initialize the TUI locator window Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5592A753.4030004@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox