From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>,
Catalin Udma <catalin.udma@freescale.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64/gdbserver: fix floating point registers display
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EB7965.8070208@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EB5C86.4030307@codesourcery.com>
On 13/08/14 13:39, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 08:25 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
>> The 'it' in 'fix it' is ambiguous to me.
>> Does the 'it' mean:
>> fix aarch64-core.xml to change cpsr to 32 bits ?
>
> That was what I meant, however ....
>
>> or does that confirm the initial proposal i.e.
>> fix e.g. aarch64.dat to change cpsr to 64 bits ?
>
> ... I find a patch changed cpsr to 64 bit in last Dec.
>
> [PATCH] AARCH64: Change cpsr type to be 64bit.
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00720.html
>
> and looks aarch64.dat was not updated together in this patch.
>
> I am sure that aarch64.dat and aarch64-core.xml are not in sync,
> but I don't know which way to go, sorry.
>
Changing the XML doesn't sound like the right way forward, the XML can
be embedded into other components as part of the register description
interface.
Hmm, I can't see where anyone ever formally approved that change. In
fact, Mark K commented at the time:
"Basing GDB's fundamentals on a particular OS's ptrace(2)
implementation is a bad idea."
So it seems to me that that change was indeed incorrect and should
probably be reverted (at least in its current incarnation).
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 9:23 Catalin Udma
2014-08-12 9:43 ` Richard Earnshaw
2014-08-12 10:29 ` Yao Qi
2014-08-13 12:24 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2014-08-13 12:43 ` catalin.udma
[not found] ` <53EB5C86.4030307@codesourcery.com>
2014-08-13 14:42 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2014-08-20 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-21 6:54 ` catalin.udma
2014-08-21 6:56 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-08-21 7:30 ` Yao Qi
2014-08-21 16:05 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-01 9:51 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-06 9:06 ` catalin.udma
2014-10-06 12:28 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EB7965.8070208@arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.udma@freescale.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox