From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string.
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 09:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5386F73C.8000102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538670AE.3050305@broadcom.com>
On 05/29/2014 12:26 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 6:26 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 11:55 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> IMO, the real problem with its signature is the "frame_" in its name.
>> The function converts an 'enum unwind_stop_reason' value to a string,
>> so like other similar cases in the tree, how about renaming the function
>> to match? E.g.:
>>
>> -const char *frame_stop_reason_string (enum unwind_stop_reason);
>> +const char *unwind_stop_reason_to_string (enum unwind_stop_reason);
>
> I've gone with this suggestion, updated patch below. Is this OK to apply?
Not yet, sorry.
> * frame.c (frame_stop_reason_string): Rename to ...
> (unwind_frame_stop_reason_string): this.
This still has "frame" in the name, and misses the "to". Any reason for that?
The specific suggestion had a logic --
convert "enum unwind_stop_reason" to "string" -> "unwind_stop_reason_to_string".
That is just like target_waitstatus_to_string and
target_xfer_status_to_string, for example.
Without even looking at the function's declaration, I can tell
that is converting the enum value. While "unwind_frame_stop_reason_string"
without the "to" doesn't give me that impression, and is very much
confusable with the new frame_stop_reason_string.
> * frame.h (frame_stop_reason_string): Rename to ...
> (unwind_frame_stop_reason_string): this.
> * stack.c (frame_info): Update call to frame_stop_reason_string.
> (backtrace_command_1): Likewise.
> * guile/scm-frame.c (gdbscm_unwind_stop_reason_string): Likewise.
> * python/py-frame.c (gdbpy_frame_stop_reason_string): Likewise.
...
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.h b/gdb/frame.h
> index ad03a0b..5acb2a2 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.h
> +++ b/gdb/frame.h
> @@ -501,9 +501,11 @@ enum unwind_stop_reason
>
> enum unwind_stop_reason get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *);
>
> -/* Translate a reason code to an informative string. */
> +/* Translate a reason code to an informative string. This returns a
> + general string describing the stop reason, for a possibly frame
> + specific reason string, use frame_stop_reason_string. */
Please remove this comment hunk from this patch, so that the patch
remains independent, and so that it can go in immediately even if
further discuss patch #4.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 14:46 [RFC 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:47 ` [RFC 1/4] New tests for backtracing with a corrupted stack Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:48 ` [RFC 2/4] Remove previous frame if we error during compute_frame_id Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:53 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-15 19:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-04 14:49 ` [RFC 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:50 ` [RFC 4/4] Add TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame and frame specific strop strings Andrew Burgess
2014-04-15 9:11 ` [RFC 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Remove previous frame if an error occurs when computing frame id during unwind Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Add a TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame to better handle errors " Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-04-29 19:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:46 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] New test for backtrace when the stack pointer is invalid (inaccessible) Andrew Burgess
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 17:26 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-28 23:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:00 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-05-29 9:53 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] New test for backtrace when the stack pointer is invalid (inaccessible) Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 18:42 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Add a TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame to better handle errors during unwind Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-28 23:35 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:41 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-29 23:02 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-30 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Remove previous frame if an error occurs when computing frame id " Andrew Burgess
2014-05-16 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-28 23:16 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5386F73C.8000102@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox