From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Add a TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame to better handle errors during unwind.
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53862B81.2070306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398855344-25278-5-git-send-email-aburgess@broadcom.com>
On 04/30/2014 11:55 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Here a new TRY_CATCH is added to the core of get_prev_frame, all uncaught
> errors are turned into UNWIND_MISC_ERROR, and where possible the error
> message associated with the error is stored as a frame specific stop reason
> string. The reason string is held of the frame OBSTACK so it lives as long
> as the frame does.
>
> There's a new function for getting the frame_stop_reason_string, this
> replaces the now (thanks to patch #3) old frame_stop_reason_string
> function, I know that reusing the name could confuse, but this function was
> not widely used, so I hope that'll not be an issue.
Sounds like we'll want to expose this to Python too. If you're not
planning on doing that, could you file a PR once this goes in?
>
> Finally, I update the expected results from the tests in patch #1 now that
> everything should pass.
>
> I don't know if you'll all be happy with me catching _all_ errors in
> get_prev_frame.
Yeah, that makes me somewhat nervous. E.g., this catches and
swallows TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR.
> Given that the issues I'm seeing "in the wild" and which
> I've put into the tests are for accessing invalid memory through a bad
> stack pointer, I could reduce the catching to only catch MEMORY_ERRORs,
> then UNWIND_MISC_ERROR would become UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR.
I think I'd prefer that. This swallows TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR, for example.
Could you please include both MI and CLI before/after examples
in the description/commit log, please? You had something
close to that in the cover letter, but that doesn't make it to
the repository.
> I could even add
> the memory error detection on top of the new MISC_ERROR case if preferred,
> though I'd need to think of a new test...
I didn't understand this.
>
> Feedback welcome, or is this OK?
> * unwind_stop_reason.def: Add UNWIND_MISC_ERROR.
Values added here are exposed to Python/scheme automatically.
But, we need to document them manually in the manual. E.g.
for python, in gdb/python.texi in the table beneath the
description of Frame.unwind_stop_reason ().
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 14:46 [RFC 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:47 ` [RFC 1/4] New tests for backtracing with a corrupted stack Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:48 ` [RFC 2/4] Remove previous frame if we error during compute_frame_id Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:53 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-15 19:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-04 14:49 ` [RFC 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-04 14:50 ` [RFC 4/4] Add TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame and frame specific strop strings Andrew Burgess
2014-04-15 9:11 ` [RFC 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] New test for backtrace when the stack pointer is invalid (inaccessible) Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-04-29 19:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:46 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Remove previous frame if an error occurs when computing frame id during unwind Andrew Burgess
2014-04-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Add a TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame to better handle errors " Andrew Burgess
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Catch errors in get_prev_frame Andrew Burgess
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Remove previous frame if an error occurs when computing frame id during unwind Andrew Burgess
2014-05-16 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-28 23:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] New test for backtrace when the stack pointer is invalid (inaccessible) Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 18:42 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Add a TRY_CATCH to get_prev_frame to better handle errors during unwind Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 18:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-05-28 23:35 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:41 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-29 23:02 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-30 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Deprecate frame_stop_reason_string Andrew Burgess
2014-05-28 17:26 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-28 23:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:00 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-29 9:53 ` Andrew Burgess
2014-05-29 9:56 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53862B81.2070306@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox