From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: checked in: Re: RFC: solib.c:solib_map_sections so->so_name clobbering
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526B2A53.7080905@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526B2936.3080208@codesourcery.com>
On 10/26/2013 12:30 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like this commit introduced a small regression for MI and
> shared libraries, and the testsuite does not cover this case.
>
> Suppose we have GDB running on a host and a stub/gdbserver running on a
> separate remote target. Suppose shared libraries (for symbols) on the
> target are located in a different path compared to the host, say,
> <host_path> and <target_path>.
>
> During debugging, eventually the shared libraries will be loaded and we
> used to see a shared library load notification like the following:
>
> =library-loaded,id="<target_path>/libhello.so",target-name="<target_path>/libhello.so",host-name="<host_path>/libhello.so",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
>
>
> After this commit, this is what we see:
>
> =library-loaded,id="<target_path>/libhello.so",target-name="<target_path>/libhello.so",host-name="<target_path>/libhello.so",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
>
>
> So it looks like we've lost information about the shared library's path
> on the host, which may not be a big deal for CLI GDB, but may confuse
> consumers of MI output.
>
> I gave this a quick thought, but reverting the change seemed like the
> most obvious solution.
>
> But since this change affects darwin, maybe Joel has a different idea?
>
>
This is the commit i was referring to in case my attempt to update the
original thread failed:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00105.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-26 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-26 2:30 Luis Machado
2013-10-26 2:35 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2013-10-26 4:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-10-27 2:46 ` Luis Machado
2013-10-28 11:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-04 16:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-15 10:02 ` Joel Brobecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-18 19:34 [PATCH 02/10] clean up allocation of bfd filenames Tom Tromey
2013-03-28 12:29 ` RFC: solib.c:solib_map_sections so->so_name clobbering (was: [PATCH 02/10] clean up allocation of bfd filenames) Joel Brobecker
2013-03-28 19:12 ` RFC: solib.c:solib_map_sections so->so_name clobbering Tom Tromey
2013-03-29 1:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-04-11 4:03 ` checked in: " Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526B2A53.7080905@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox