From: ali_anwar <ali_anwar@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Updated patch for Bug 13217 - thread apply all detach throws a SEGFAULT
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DD37FA.8010306@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C7628F.5080004@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2192 bytes --]
On 12/11/2012 09:42 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 03:36 PM, ali_anwar wrote:
>> + if (thread_count ())
>> + {
>> + struct thread_info *tp_array;
>> + struct thread_info *tp;
>> + int i, k;
>> +
>> + /* Save a copy of the thread_list in case we execute detach
>> + command. */
>> + tp_array = xmalloc (sizeof (struct thread_info) * thread_count ());
>
> No need to compute the thread count twice, you can cache it. No need to
> copy the whole thread structure. Make this an array of a thread
> pointers, and then,
>
>> + for (i = 0, tp = thread_list; tp; i++, tp = tp->next)
>> + tp_array[i] = *tp;
>
> ALL_THREADS (tp)
> {
> tp_array[i] = tp;
> tp->refcount++;
> }
>
> This increments the refcount of each current thread, so that attempts to
> delete it just mark it as deleted (so the C object remains valid).
>
>> +
>> + for (k = 0; k != i; k++)
>> + if (thread_alive (&tp_array[k]))
>
> and then write:
>
> for (k = 0; k != i; k++)
> {
> if (thread_alive (tp_array[k]))
> {
> switch_to_thread (tp_array[k]->ptid);
>
> printf_filtered (_("\nThread %d (%s):\n"),
> (tp_array->num, target_pid_to_str (inferior_ptid));
> execute_command (cmd, from_tty);
> strcpy (cmd, saved_cmd); /* Restore exact command used
> previously. */
> }
> }
>
> And put this in a cleanup:
>
> for (k = 0; k != i; k++)
> tp_array[k]->refcount--;
>
> So that if the command throws an error, we still leave with the correct
> refcounts.
>
> The advantages are:
>
> - less memory necessary for the array.
> - handles the corner case of the target reusing a ptid (see
> add_thread_silent). IOW, this way, even if the command happens to
> make the target reuse a ptid, "thread apply all" won't run the command
> on that new threads my mistake.
>
>
I have tried to implement what you suggested in the attach patch. Does
it look reasonable?
Thanks,
-Ali
[-- Attachment #2: Thread_apply_all.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3787 bytes --]
Index: gdb/thread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/thread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -r1.153 thread.c
--- gdb/thread.c 11 Mar 2013 08:17:08 -0000 1.153
+++ gdb/thread.c 10 Jul 2013 09:51:08 -0000
@@ -65,6 +65,12 @@
static void restore_current_thread (ptid_t);
static void prune_threads (void);
+struct thread_array_cleanup {
+ struct thread_info **tp_array;
+ int count;
+};
+
+
struct thread_info*
inferior_thread (void)
{
@@ -1125,6 +1131,15 @@
xfree (old);
}
+static void
+make_cleanup_thread_refcount (void *data)
+{
+ int k;
+ struct thread_array_cleanup *ta_cleanup = data;
+ for (k = 0; k != ta_cleanup->count; k++)
+ ta_cleanup->tp_array[k]->refcount--;
+}
+
struct cleanup *
make_cleanup_restore_current_thread (void)
{
@@ -1176,13 +1191,13 @@
thread apply 1 2 7 4 backtrace Apply backtrace cmd to threads 1,2,7,4
thread apply 2-7 9 p foo(1) Apply p foo(1) cmd to threads 2->7 & 9
thread apply all p x/i $pc Apply x/i $pc cmd to all threads. */
-
static void
thread_apply_all_command (char *cmd, int from_tty)
{
- struct thread_info *tp;
struct cleanup *old_chain;
char *saved_cmd;
+ int tc;
+ struct thread_array_cleanup ta_cleanup;
if (cmd == NULL || *cmd == '\000')
error (_("Please specify a command following the thread ID list"));
@@ -1195,17 +1210,41 @@
execute_command. */
saved_cmd = xstrdup (cmd);
make_cleanup (xfree, saved_cmd);
- for (tp = thread_list; tp; tp = tp->next)
- if (thread_alive (tp))
- {
- switch_to_thread (tp->ptid);
+ tc = thread_count ();
- printf_filtered (_("\nThread %d (%s):\n"),
- tp->num, target_pid_to_str (inferior_ptid));
- execute_command (cmd, from_tty);
- strcpy (cmd, saved_cmd); /* Restore exact command used
- previously. */
- }
+ if (tc)
+ {
+ struct thread_info **tp_array;
+ struct thread_info *tp;
+ int i, k;
+ i = 0;
+
+ /* Save a copy of the thread_list in case we execute detach
+ command. */
+ tp_array = xmalloc (sizeof (struct thread_info*) * tc);
+ ta_cleanup.tp_array = tp_array;
+ ta_cleanup.count = tc;
+
+ ALL_THREADS (tp)
+ {
+ tp_array[i] = tp;
+ tp->refcount++;
+ i++;
+ }
+ for (k = 0; k != i; k++)
+ if (thread_alive (tp_array[k]))
+ {
+ switch_to_thread (tp_array[k]->ptid);
+ printf_filtered (_("\nThread %d (%s):\n"),
+ tp_array[k]->num, target_pid_to_str (inferior_ptid));
+ execute_command (cmd, from_tty);
+ strcpy (cmd, saved_cmd); /* Restore exact command used
+ previously. */
+ }
+
+ make_cleanup (xfree, tp_array);
+ make_cleanup (make_cleanup_thread_refcount, &ta_cleanup);
+ }
do_cleanups (old_chain);
}
Index: gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadapply.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadapply.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 threadapply.exp
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadapply.exp 1 Jan 2013 06:41:27 -0000 1.16
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadapply.exp 10 Jul 2013 09:51:08 -0000
@@ -63,3 +63,4 @@
gdb_test "up" ".*in main.*" "go up in the stack frame"
gdb_test "thread apply all print 1" "Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1.*Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1.*Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1.*Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1.*Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1.*Thread ..*\\\$\[0-9]+ = 1" "run a simple print command on all threads"
gdb_test "down" "#0.*thread_function.*" "go down and check selected frame"
+gdb_test "thread apply all detach" "Thread .*"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-26 11:46 ali_anwar
2012-09-26 11:50 ` ali_anwar
2012-09-27 15:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-27 15:32 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-10 18:37 ` ali_anwar
2012-12-10 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-11 15:37 ` ali_anwar
2012-12-11 16:43 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-10 10:31 ` ali_anwar [this message]
2013-07-10 12:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-07-10 17:55 ` Tom Tromey
2013-07-11 12:30 ` ali_anwar
2013-07-13 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
2013-07-15 11:20 ` ali_anwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DD37FA.8010306@codesourcery.com \
--to=ali_anwar@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox