From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: "Blanc, Nicolas" <nicolas.blanc@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove-symbol-file
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51781A68.4010004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <388084C8C1E6A64FA36AD1D656E4856619DEEE98@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 04/24/2013 06:30 PM, Blanc, Nicolas wrote:
> Thanks Tom, Pedro for your feedback.
>
> I'll try to respond to both of you in this email.
>
> This implementation only removes files that were added via the add-symbol-file command.
> The add-symbol-file command takes as parameter the address of the text session. In this
> context I think the text address is the most appropriate way to remove a file because:
> 1) the user knows exactly where the .text section was loaded,
So how do you handle the case of there being no .text section at all?
> 2) an application can load shared libraries several times at different addresses (it's a requirement for me), and
> 3) I can't think of a good reason why someone would add a second symbol file at the same address.
> Most likely this is a user error that should have been reported by add-symbol-file.
>
> Note that currently in Option 4 below ADDR is in fact "objf->addr_low", but the command could be more generous
> by searching first which file corresponds to ADDR and then removing it. This would be more flexible and an
> alternative to Option 3, for instance.
You lost me here.
>
> 1) remove-symbol-file FILE
> 2) remove-symbol-file FILE ADDR
> 3) remove-symbol-file -s .data DATA_ADDR
> 4) remove-symbol-file ADDR
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 11:22 Nicolas Blanc
2013-04-16 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] Test adding and removing a symbol file at runtime Nicolas Blanc
2013-04-24 12:18 ` Tom Tromey
2013-04-24 12:18 ` Tom Tromey
2013-04-16 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] Command remove-symbol-file Nicolas Blanc
2013-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] Added command remove-symbol-file Nicolas Blanc
2013-04-22 13:32 ` Yao Qi
2013-04-24 18:54 ` Tom Tromey
2013-04-25 19:24 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-04-25 20:07 ` Tom Tromey
2013-04-26 14:13 ` Yao Qi
2013-04-26 20:23 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-30 7:30 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-04-30 9:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-30 16:53 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-05-08 17:56 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-28 11:25 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-04-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] Documentation for the remove-symbol-file command Nicolas Blanc
2013-04-16 15:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-24 9:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] remove-symbol-file Tom Tromey
2013-04-24 20:40 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-04-24 20:49 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-04-25 17:25 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-04-26 19:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-24 17:46 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51781A68.4010004@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nicolas.blanc@intel.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox