Re: [PATCH] Add CTF support to GDB [5] Add test for CTF function

[Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>]

On 01/14/2013 11:48 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> --- a/testsuite/gdb.trace/Makefile.in
> +++ b/testsuite/gdb.trace/Makefile.in
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ srcdir = @srcdir@
>
>   PROGS = ax backtrace deltrace disconnected-tracing infotrace packetlen \
>   	passc-dyn passcount report save-trace tfile tfind tracecmd tsv \
> -	unavailable while-dyn while-stepping
> +	unavailable while-dyn while-stepping ctf

Looks we should keep the alphabetic order of this list.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testsuite/gdb.trace/ctf.exp
> +
> +#Test "tsave -ctf"
> +
> +gdb_test "trace 24" "Tracepoint \[0-9\]+ at .*"

We can use 'gdb_get_line_number' instead of hard-code the line number.

> +gdb_trace_setactions "set action for line 24" "" \
> +	"collect \$local" "^$"
> +gdb_test "trace 25" "Tracepoint \[0-9\]+ at .*"

Likewise.

> +gdb_trace_setactions "set action for line 25" "" \
> +	"collect \$reg" "^$"
> +
> +gdb_test_no_output "tstart"
> +
> +gdb_test "break end" "Breakpoint ${decimal} at .*"
> +gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\[ \r\n\]+Breakpoint.*"
> +gdb_test_no_output "tstop"
> +
> +gdb_test "tsave -ctf $ctfdir" "Trace data saved to directory \'$ctfdir\'."
> +

What if GDB is built without ctf support?

> +set ret [exec whereis babeltrace]

We should use 'remote_exec host' instead of 'exec' and I am not sure it 
is portable to check 'babeltrace' exist by 'whereis'.

> +if { [string compare "babeltrace:" $ret] == 0 } then {
> +    unsupported "babeltrace check ctf directory"
> +} else {
> +    set ret [catch {exec babeltrace $ctfdir} results]

remote_exec host 'babeltrace $ctfdir'

> +    if { $ret != 0 } then {
> +	fail "babeltrace open ctf directory"
> +	return -1
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +
> +#Test "target ctf"
> +
> +gdb_test_no_output "set confirm off"
> +gdb_test_no_output "target ctf $ctfdir"
> +
> +gdb_test "tfind 0" ".*Found trace frame 0.*"
> +gdb_test "tdump" ".*b = 1.*a = 0.*i = 0.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$b" ".* = 1.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$a" ".* = 0.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$i" ".* = 0.*"
> +
> +gdb_test "tfind 1" ".*Found trace frame 1.*"
> +
> +gdb_test "tfind 2" ".*Found trace frame 2.*"
> +gdb_test "tdump" ".*b = 2.*a = 1.*i = 1.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$b" ".* = 2.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$a" ".* = 1.*"
> +gdb_test "print \$i" ".* = 1.*"
> +

I don't run it but there must be some duplicated test results in 
gdb.sum, such as "tdump", "print $a", and etc.

It is better to run 'tfind' until there is no trace frame in the trace 
file, to make sure no unexpected trace frame is generated.

> +
> +#Clean
> +
> +exec rm -rf $ctfdir

remote_exec host "rm -rf $ctfdir"
-- 
Yao (齐尧)