From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] gdb: infrun: consume multiple events at each pass in stop_all_threads
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:37:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e222a1a-abb0-7305-b5d5-9edb541f7b2c@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f72901e3-53f1-9436-759e-d109a4dced4a@efficios.com>
On 2020-03-11 3:13 p.m., Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> On 2020-02-24 2:36 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
>> From: Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>
>>
>> [Simon: I send this patch on behalf of Laurent Morichetti, I added the
>> commit message and performance measurement stuff.
>>
>> Also, this patch is better viewed with "git show -w".]
>>
>> stop_all_threads, in infrun.c, is used to stop all running threads on
>> targets that are always non-stop. It's used, for example, when the
>> program hits a breakpoint while GDB is set to "non-stop off". It sends
>> a stop request for each running thread, then collects one wait event for
>> each.
>>
>> Since new threads can spawn while we are stopping the threads, it's
>> written in a way where it makes multiple such "send stop requests to
>> running threads & collect wait events" passes. The function completes
>> when it has made two passes where it hasn't seen any running threads.
>>
>> With the way it's written right now is, it iterates on the thread list,
>> sending a stop request for each running thread. It then waits for a
>> single event, after which it iterates through the thread list again. It
>> sends stop requests for any running threads that's been created since
>> the last iteration. It then consumes another single wait event.
>>
>> This makes it so we iterate on O(n^2) threads in total, where n is the
>> number of threads. This patch changes the function to reduce it to
>> O(n). This starts to have an impact when dealing with multiple
>> thousands of threads (see numbers below). At each pass, we know the
>> number of outstanding stop requests we have sent, for which we need to
>> collect a stop event. We can therefore loop to collect this many stop
>> events before proceeding to the next pass and iterate on the thread list
>> again.
>>
>> To check the performance improvements with this patch, I made an
>> x86/Linux program with a large number of idle threads (varying from 1000
>> to 10000). The program's main thread hits a breakpoint once all these
>> threads have started, which causes stop_all_threads to be called to stop
>> all these threads. I measured (by patching stop_all_threads):
>>
>> - the execution time of stop_all_threads
>> - the total number of threads we iterate on during the complete
>> execution of the function (the total number of times we execute the
>> "for (thread_info *t : all_non_exited_threads ())" loop)
>>
>> These are the execution times, in milliseconds:
>>
>> # threads before after
>> 1000 226 106
>> 2000 997 919
>> 3000 3461 2323
>> 4000 4330 3570
>> 5000 8642 6600
>> 6000 9918 8039
>> 7000 12662 10930
>> 8000 16652 11222
>> 9000 21561 15875
>> 10000 26613 20019
>>
>> Note that I very unscientifically executed each case only once.
>>
>> These are the number of loop executions:
>>
>> # threads before after
>> 1000 1003002 3003
>> 2000 4006002 6003
>> 3000 9009002 9003
>> 4000 16012002 12003
>> 5000 25015002 15003
>> 6000 36018002 18003
>> 7000 49021002 21003
>> 8000 64024002 24003
>> 9000 81027002 27003
>> 10000 100030002 30003
>>
>> This last table shows pretty well the O(n^2) vs O(n) behaviors.
>>
>> Reg-tested on x86 GNU/Linux (Ubuntu 16.04).
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>> YYYY-MM-DD Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>
>> YYYY-MM-DD Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
>>
>> * infrun.c (stop_all_threads): Collect multiple wait events at
>> each pass.
>
> Ping.
>
> Simon
>
I'll push this patch in ~ 1 week if there are no comments.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 19:36 [PATCH] " Simon Marchi
2020-03-11 19:13 ` Simon Marchi
2020-03-25 16:37 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-04-16 17:51 ` Pedro Alves
2020-04-16 20:32 ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-14 14:32 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 18:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Simon Marchi
2020-05-14 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 16:06 ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-15 16:15 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 16:53 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e222a1a-abb0-7305-b5d5-9edb541f7b2c@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox