From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] gdb/xcoffread: remove xcoff_symfile_info::{symtbl, symtbl_num_syms}
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:24:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a8db879-e6cb-49d7-a084-ad73da2d1654@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h5svon90.fsf@tromey.com>
On 1/8/26 3:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:
>
> Simon> It is not necessary to save the symbol table content and number of
> Simon> symbols in xcoff_symfile_info, because they are only needed for the
> Simon> duration of scan_xcoff_symtab.
>
> Simon> Move the reading of the symbol table content to scan_xcoff_symtab, and
> Simon> keep everything as local variables.
>
> Simon> + /* Seek to symbol table location. */
> Simon> + if (int ret = bfd_seek (abfd, symtab_offset, SEEK_SET);
> Simon> + ret < 0)
> Simon> + error (_("Error reading symbols from %s: %s"),
> Simon> + objfile_name (objfile), bfd_errmsg (bfd_get_error ()));
>
> 'ret' doesn't really seem to be needed here.
What do you mean, not needed? Don't we want to check the return value
of bfd_seek?
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 19:33 [PATCH 0/8] More xcoffread cleanups Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] gdb/xcoffread: remove name computation Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] gdb/xcoffread: remove read of .debug section Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] gdb/xcoffread: remove XCOFF_DATA macro Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:34 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] gdb/xcoffread: remove xcoff_symfile_info::{symtbl, symtbl_num_syms} Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:36 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 21:24 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2026-01-08 22:17 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-09 2:05 ` Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] gdb/xcoffread: allocate symbol table using vector in scan_xcoff_symtab Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:37 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] gdb/xcoffread: simplify xcoff_secnum_to_sections Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:39 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] gdb/xcoffread: replace 2 switches with if Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:40 ` Tom Tromey
2026-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] gdb/xcoffread: stylistic cleanup Simon Marchi
2026-01-08 20:41 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a8db879-e6cb-49d7-a084-ad73da2d1654@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox