Re: Fwd: Re: [patch] Add support for ARMv7M devices.

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 03/09/2012 04:24 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:

> Over a year ago, after discussion and some helpful pointers from Daniel, I
> submitted this patch:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-11/msg00142.html
> 
> Unfortunately it fell by the wayside.
> 
> This issue is coming to a head for the eCos project as we are updating our
> ARM toolchain (we avoid the bleeding edge). However that means we really
> need GDB to preserve backward compatibility, which it presently fails to do.
> 
> We don't want to break backward compatibility with installed GDB stubs,

> and the XML solution is complicated for users, opaque, not really suitable

> for Eclipse (although there may be proprietary plugins around which try to
> solve this, that isn't relevant for public GDB). Most importantly the
> attached patch should flexibly work everywhere, and not break anyone's
> compatibility. And furthermore, it allows us a clean migration path to the
> changed 'g' packet length.
> 
> So I'm attaching an updated version of the patch for current GDB trunk. If
> it helps, I do have an FSF assignment and, from prehistory, commit
> permissions.


I support this.  I wrote essentially the same without being aware of
your patch: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00372.html>.

Wish I had seen yours before that.

If there are no other comments in a week or so, I say put this in.

On 03/09/2012 04:24 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>  	}
> +      else
> +        is_m = 0;
>

I think this is unnecessary though.  The variable is initialized to 0.

-- 
Pedro Alves