Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [patch] Add support for ARMv7M devices.
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F622210.7010904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F618BA0.6000603@eCosCentric.com>

On 03/15/2012 06:26 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:

> On 14/03/12 16:06, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 03/11/2012 03:36 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you just clarify to me how, for example, a program using VFP registers
>>> (such as for Cortex-M4) would use the correct 'g' packet size? The
>>> registers correspond to the tdesc, and not to either of the guessed sizes.
>>> I guess if I could understand that example, I'll be happy. You can do this
>>> off list if you like, to save others from boredom.
>>
>> Even without a description, and before connecting to the remote side,
>> GDB already has a clue of the target's architecture, inferred from the
>> executable. GDB updates target_gdbarch based on that, and sets an initial
>> expected size of the g packet based on the register set it things the
>> target has (based on what it figured out from the executable).
>>
>> static void *
>> init_remote_state (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>> {
>> ...
>>   /* Record the maximum possible size of the g packet - it may turn out
>>      to be smaller.  */
>>   rsa->sizeof_g_packet = map_regcache_remote_table (gdbarch, rsa->regs);
>>
>> If it turns out to be smaller, GDB will re-adjust (process_g_packet).
> 
> Ah ok, that's what I was missing. And that uses gdbarch_num_regs() which
> corresponds to arm-tdep.h's ARM_NUM_REGS which includes all possible
> registers, both VFP and FPA. And later the 'g' packet is shrunk.
> 
> So, just to be clear, if neither the user nor target supplies a tdesc, the
> block in arm_gdbarch_init() starting with:
>    if (tdesc_has_registers (tdesc))
> will never be run? If that's the case, no need to answer. Or is
> arm_gdbarch_init() called a second time after the remote 'g' packet
> guessing occurs (which has selected a tdesc)?


It is called a second time.  You can try putting a breakpoint
there and see what happens.

From reading the code, we'll reach:

      /* If we could not find a description using qXfer, and we know
	 how to do it some other way, try again.  This is not
	 supported for non-stop; it could be, but it is tricky if
	 there are no stopped threads when we connect.  */
      if (remote_read_description_p (target)
	  && gdbarch_target_desc (target_gdbarch) == NULL)
	{
	  target_clear_description ();
	  target_find_description ();
	}

and target_find_description will call gdbarch_update_p, which should
end up in gdbarch_find_by_info calling:

  /* Ask the tdep code for an architecture that matches "info".  */
  new_gdbarch = rego->init (info, rego->arches);

Which will end up in arm_gdbarch_init creating a new gdbarch
modelled on the guessed target description (after the checks), since no
gdbarch has this tdesc yet.

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-15 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-09  4:25 Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-09 11:44 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-09 15:53   ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-09 16:06     ` Pedro Alves
2012-04-16  7:56   ` Terry Guo
2012-04-16 14:40     ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-04-17  4:06       ` Terry Guo
2012-03-09 15:39 ` Yao Qi
2012-03-09 16:13   ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-09 16:29     ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-11  3:37       ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-14 16:06         ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15  6:27           ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-15 17:09             ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-03-15 18:33               ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-15 18:43                 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15 18:56                   ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-03-15 18:58                     ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F622210.7010904@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jifl@eCosCentric.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox