Re: [patch] update_global_location_list my comment fix [Re: [PATCH] Fix breakpoint updates for multi-inferior]

[Luis Gustavo <luis_gustavo@mentor.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]

On 02/08/2012 09:32 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I don't know this area, so cannot formally review, but a minor comment:
>
>> +  if (a->pspace != b->pspace)
>> +    return (a->pspace>  b->pspace)
>> +	   - (a->pspace<  b->pspace);
>
> The GNU Coding Standards asks us to use an extra pair of parentheses
> in order to help code formatters, even if it is strictly not necessary
> here, thus:
>
>          return ((a->pspace>  b->pspace)
>                  - ((a->pspace<  b->pspace)));
>
> But going beyond this, ISTM that you can simply put the entire
> expression on one line and be done with it:
>
>    if (a->pspace != b->pspace)
>      return (a->pspace>  b->pspace) - (a->pspace<  b->pspace);
>

I went with putting everything on one line.

Luis

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-fix_multiprocess_breaks.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 932 bytes --]

2012-02-08  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>

	* breakpoint.c (bp_location_compare): Sort by pspace before sorting by
	number.

Index: gdb/gdb/breakpoint.c
===================================================================
--- gdb.orig/gdb/breakpoint.c	2012-02-08 19:29:41.887074999 -0200
+++ gdb/gdb/breakpoint.c	2012-02-08 21:38:10.935074996 -0200
@@ -10589,6 +10589,12 @@ bp_location_compare (const void *ap, con
   if (a_perm != b_perm)
     return (a_perm < b_perm) - (a_perm > b_perm);
 
+  /* Sort by pspace.  This effectively sorts locations by inferior in
+     a multi-inferior environment.  */
+
+  if (a->pspace != b->pspace)
+    return (a->pspace > b->pspace) - (a->pspace < b->pspace);
+
   /* Make the internal GDB representation stable across GDB runs
      where A and B memory inside GDB can differ.  Breakpoint locations of
      the same type at the same address can be sorted in arbitrary order.  */