From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Skip kill-after-signal.exp if hw single-step is not supported
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E414503.7080201@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107232247.p6NMlwVx029216@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
On 07/24/2011 06:47 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:05:43 +0100
>>
>> Other archs !x86, and other kernels/stubs/servers !Linux that
>> can do hardware stepping. If we're going to have a list, invert
>> the logic of the check, defaulting to running the test, and leaving
>> out archs were we know software stepping is used. Some targets,
>> like x86/OpenBSD and MacOS, although can hardware step, can't step
>> into a handler.
>
> Just FYI, it's putting breakpoints into the signal trampoline that is
> the issue, at least on OpenBSD. Single-stepping should work fine on
> OpenBSD/i386 and OpenBSD/amd64 and all other architectures where it's
> done in hardware.
This is the 2nd version of the patch. A new predicate,
single_step_to_signal_handler_p, is added in lib/gdb.exp. In default,
it returns true, and return false on target "arm*-*-* and "mips*-*-*".
I don't find any other tests using "stepi" to step into signal handler,
so I only changed kill-after-signal.exp.
OK for mainline?
--
Yao (é½å°§)
[-- Attachment #2: single_step_to_signal_handler_p.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1627 bytes --]
gdb/testsuite/
* lib/gdb.exp (single_step_to_signal_handler_p): New.
* gdb.base/kill-after-signal.exp: Skip if target supports single step
to signal handler.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/kill-after-signal.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/kill-after-signal.exp
index eecad2e..f7086fc 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/kill-after-signal.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/kill-after-signal.exp
@@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
set testfile "kill-after-signal"
+
+if { ![single_step_to_signal_handler_p] } {
+ untested ${testfile}.exp
+ return
+}
+
if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile}] {
return -1
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index ef5ad5c..b967a97 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -1527,6 +1527,21 @@ proc support_complex_tests {} {
return $support_complex_tests_saved
}
+# Return 1 if target hardware or OS supports single stepping to single handler,
+# otherwise, return 0.
+
+proc single_step_to_signal_handler_p {} {
+
+ # Targets don't have hardware single step. On these targets, when a signal
+ # is delivered during software single step, gdb is unable to determine the
+ # next instruction addresses, because start of signal handler is one of them.
+ if { [istarget "arm*-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"] } {
+ return 0
+ }
+
+ return 1
+}
+
# Return 1 if target is ILP32.
# This cannot be decided simply from looking at the target string,
# as it might depend on externally passed compiler options like -m64.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 14:52 Yao Qi
2011-07-20 15:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-20 15:12 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-24 11:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-08-09 14:32 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-08-09 15:24 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-08-09 15:50 ` Yao Qi
2011-08-18 4:53 ` ping : " Yao Qi
2011-08-28 14:44 ` Yao Qi
2011-09-14 7:18 ` ping 3: " Yao Qi
2011-09-18 2:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-09-18 10:22 ` [committed]: " Yao Qi
2011-07-23 23:28 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E414503.7080201@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox