From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D714472.6050404@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103041928.03380.pedro@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2011 18:49:21, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure what to do with this one.
>>
>> It clearly falls through, and it works as is, so the least change
>> is just to comment it.
>
> It looks irrelevant.
It's always relevant to document a fall-through.
> The intent of the code is obviously
> to iterate over all breakpoints, or all kinds.
> The "continue" is continuing the loop hidden in
> ALL_BREAKPOINTS at the next iteration. But if you replace
> all the continue's with break's it will still work the same,
> because the "break" would break the the "switch", not the
> loop. I think if you do that the code ends up simpler to
> read, with no magic.
>
Agreed. Extending the same fix to disable_command, and committing.
[-- Attachment #2: break9.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1550 bytes --]
2011-03-04 Michael Snyder <msnyder@msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com>
* breakpoint.c (enable_command): Use break instead of continue,
and fill in a missing break.
(disable_command): Ditto.
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.546
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.546 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c 1 Mar 2011 02:16:56 -0000 1.546
+++ breakpoint.c 4 Mar 2011 19:56:21 -0000
@@ -10929,7 +10929,7 @@ disable_command (char *args, int from_tt
case bp_none:
warning (_("attempted to disable apparently deleted breakpoint #%d?"),
bpt->number);
- continue;
+ break;
case bp_breakpoint:
case bp_tracepoint:
case bp_fast_tracepoint:
@@ -10941,8 +10941,9 @@ disable_command (char *args, int from_tt
case bp_read_watchpoint:
case bp_access_watchpoint:
disable_breakpoint (bpt);
+ break;
default:
- continue;
+ break;
}
else if (strchr (args, '.'))
{
@@ -11030,7 +11031,7 @@ enable_command (char *args, int from_tty
case bp_none:
warning (_("attempted to enable apparently deleted breakpoint #%d?"),
bpt->number);
- continue;
+ break;
case bp_breakpoint:
case bp_tracepoint:
case bp_fast_tracepoint:
@@ -11042,8 +11043,9 @@ enable_command (char *args, int from_tty
case bp_read_watchpoint:
case bp_access_watchpoint:
enable_breakpoint (bpt);
+ break;
default:
- continue;
+ break;
}
else if (strchr (args, '.'))
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 18:49 Michael Snyder
2011-03-04 19:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-04 19:58 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2011-03-04 21:29 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D714472.6050404@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox