Re: [commit] linux-nat.c, linux_handle_extended_wait: delete unused variable

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>]

David Daney wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 04:41 PM, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> checked in.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011-02-28  Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com>
>>
>> 	* linux-nat.c (linux_handle_extended_wait): Delete unused variable.
> 
> I'm probably being pedantic, but that is not entirely accurate in this 
> case.  It is more like:
> 
> Rewrite by nesting expressions to use fewer declared variables.

I'll change it if you really want...

>> Index: linux-nat.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/linux-nat.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.196
>> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.196 linux-nat.c
>> --- linux-nat.c	27 Feb 2011 16:25:37 -0000	1.196
>> +++ linux-nat.c	1 Mar 2011 00:39:00 -0000
>> @@ -2198,8 +2198,6 @@ linux_handle_extended_wait (struct lwp_i
>>         if (event == PTRACE_EVENT_FORK
>>   	&&  linux_fork_checkpointing_p (GET_PID (lp->ptid)))
>>   	{
>> -	  struct fork_info *fp;
>> -
>>   	  /* Handle checkpointing by linux-fork.c here as a special
>>   	     case.  We don't want the follow-fork-mode or 'catch fork'
>>   	     to interfere with this.  */
>> @@ -2209,9 +2207,8 @@ linux_handle_extended_wait (struct lwp_i
>>   	  detach_breakpoints (new_pid);
>>
>>   	  /* Retain child fork in ptrace (stopped) state.  */
>> -	  fp = find_fork_pid (new_pid);
>> -	  if (!fp)
>> -	    fp = add_fork (new_pid);
>> +	  if (!find_fork_pid (new_pid))
>> +	    add_fork (new_pid);
>>
>>   	  /* Report as spurious, so that infrun doesn't want to follow
>>   	     this fork.  We're actually doing an infcall in
>