From: sami wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6997B4.9090605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikbMcvP-+2iqZB3gP-gLcWY7B7r4t+HWtHK-a6f@mail.gmail.com>
> 1) We store symbol names such that we can compare them with ptr1 ==
> ptr2, but your patch uses strcmp.
that explains how the old hash function worked :)
> 2) I'm wondering if there's some abstraction violation with bcache not
> being aware of the extra memory that is used by
> gsymbol->language_specific.cplus_specific. Dunno, just wondering.
I think it is okay as long as the part of psymbol taken into
consideration ensures that duplicate symbols are caught (Daniel had some
comments here). Also, this is only for psymbols. Other clients still use
the old hash function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 14:11 sami wagiaalla
2010-08-16 18:29 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-16 18:56 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-16 19:56 ` sami wagiaalla [this message]
2010-08-19 16:32 ` [patch 1/2] Use custom hash function with bcache [Re: [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache] sami wagiaalla
2010-08-19 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
2010-08-25 18:30 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-30 20:53 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-01 8:25 ` Regression for gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp [Re: [patch 1/2] " Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-01 16:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-09-01 16:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-09-01 17:03 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-01 17:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-09-01 18:09 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-01 18:19 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-01 18:24 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 18:38 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-01 19:01 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-01 19:15 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 19:17 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 19:59 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-01 23:16 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 23:11 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 23:19 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-01 23:19 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-02 15:43 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-02 20:25 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-03 15:59 ` Doug Evans
2010-09-04 14:29 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-09-06 9:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-16 19:14 ` [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-16 19:50 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-16 20:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-16 20:11 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-16 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-17 17:02 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-17 17:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-17 23:26 ` Tom Tromey
2010-08-18 15:13 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-18 15:24 ` Tom Tromey
2010-08-19 16:33 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-08-19 16:37 ` [patch 2/2] Use custom hash function with bcache [Re: [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache] sami wagiaalla
2010-08-19 20:32 ` [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache Tom Tromey
2010-08-25 18:32 ` [patch 2/2] Use custom hash function with bcache [Re: [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache] sami wagiaalla
2010-08-30 20:58 ` Tom Tromey
2010-08-30 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6997B4.9090605@redhat.com \
--to=swagiaal@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox