Re: [RFA] Improve comment in linux-low.c:handle_extended_wait

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>]

Looks fine.

Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> This is a minor cleanup to a comment.
> What "it" is isn't clear.
> 
> Ok to check in?
> 
> 2008-12-13  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
> 
> 	* linux-low.c (handle_extended_wait): Improve comment.
> 
> Index: linux-low.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.84
> diff -u -p -r1.84 linux-low.c
> --- linux-low.c	12 Dec 2008 23:14:28 -0000	1.84
> +++ linux-low.c	13 Dec 2008 21:28:12 -0000
> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ handle_extended_wait (struct process_inf
>  
>        /* Normally we will get the pending SIGSTOP.  But in some cases
>  	 we might get another signal delivered to the group first.
> -         If we do, be sure not to lose it.  */
> +         If we do get another signal, be sure not to lose the SIGSTOP:
> +         when we later get it we'll want to resume.  */
>        if (WSTOPSIG (status) == SIGSTOP)
>  	{
>  	  if (stopping_threads)