From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31712 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2008 19:19:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 31704 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2008 19:19:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:18:40 +0000 Received: from mailhost5.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1CC13434; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:18:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.92.151] (promb-2s-dhcp151.eng.vmware.com [10.20.92.151]) by mailhost5.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D42DC0EF; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:18:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <494AA0DF.8040902@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:19:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve comment in linux-low.c:handle_extended_wait References: <20081213213041.D19D51C7A0F@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20081213213041.D19D51C7A0F@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 Looks fine. Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > > This is a minor cleanup to a comment. > What "it" is isn't clear. > > Ok to check in? > > 2008-12-13 Doug Evans > > * linux-low.c (handle_extended_wait): Improve comment. > > Index: linux-low.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c,v > retrieving revision 1.84 > diff -u -p -r1.84 linux-low.c > --- linux-low.c 12 Dec 2008 23:14:28 -0000 1.84 > +++ linux-low.c 13 Dec 2008 21:28:12 -0000 > @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ handle_extended_wait (struct process_inf > > /* Normally we will get the pending SIGSTOP. But in some cases > we might get another signal delivered to the group first. > - If we do, be sure not to lose it. */ > + If we do get another signal, be sure not to lose the SIGSTOP: > + when we later get it we'll want to resume. */ > if (WSTOPSIG (status) == SIGSTOP) > { > if (stopping_threads)