* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. [not found] ` <47586224.CE80C330@dessent.net> @ 2007-12-07 0:42 ` Pedro Alves 2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb; +Cc: personel personel, gdb-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3780 bytes --] [RFC patch attached -- cc'ed to gdb-patches@] Brian Dessent wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >>> (gdb) break libvlc_new >>> No symbol table is loaded. use the file command >> Try "set pending on"? Or you may need a newer version of GDB. > > I don't think pending being off is the problem, but you do need a more > recent gdb than what ships with Cygwin. With recent CVS gdb I have had > success with something like: > > gdb VLCTest.exe > add-shared-symbol-files libvlc.dll > b libvlc_new > run > > I have always found debugging stripped binaries on Win32 with gdb to be > somewhat unpleasant. After the first time that the program has run and > terminates, all the pending breakpoint stuff usually seems to work fine, > it's just that initially when nothing has loaded yet it does not. So > that's another workaround, just run the inferior to completion without > any breakpoints and then start debugging the second run. > My opinion is that the pending support should kick in on this case, like in the attached patch, like so: > gdb/gdb.exe gdb-stripped.exe GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"... (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) b LoadLibraryW Function not found in loaded symbols: LoadLibraryW Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 1 (LoadLibraryW) pending. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb-stripped.exe (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Breakpoint 1, 0x7c80ae4b in LoadLibraryW () from /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/kernel32.dll (gdb) (Those unconditional "(no debugging symbols found)" in symbol_file_add_with_addrs_or_offsets seem silly to me. An idea would be: if (mainline || from_tty || info_verbose) printf_filtered (_("(no debugging symbols found)")); ? ) And also: >gdb/gdb gdb-stripped.exe GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"... (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) b main Function not found in loaded symbols: main Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 1 (main) pending. (gdb) info b Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y(p) <PENDING> main (gdb) file gdb/gdb.exe Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe...done. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xe336e0) at ../../gdb-server_submit/src/gdb/gdb.c:28 28 memset (&args, 0, sizeof args); (gdb) info b Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x0040107a in main at ../../gdb-server_submit/src/gdb/gdb.c:28 breakpoint already hit 1 time (gdb) I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint location support? -- Pedro Alves [-- Attachment #2: pending.diff --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2424 bytes --] 2007-12-07 Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt> * breakpoint.c (break_command_1): Update pending breakpoint query text. * linespec.c (symtab_from_filename): Don't call error if there are no symbols loaded. Update message. (decode_variable): Likewise. --- gdb/breakpoint.c | 3 ++- gdb/linespec.c | 14 ++++++-------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Index: src/gdb/breakpoint.c =================================================================== --- src.orig/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-12-06 20:53:32.000000000 +0000 +++ src/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-12-07 00:07:14.000000000 +0000 @@ -5505,7 +5505,8 @@ break_command_1 (char *arg, int flag, in /* If pending breakpoint support is auto query and the user selects no, then simply return the error code. */ if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? ")) + !nquery (_("\ +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? "))) return e.reason; /* At this point, either the user was queried about setting Index: src/gdb/linespec.c =================================================================== --- src.orig/gdb/linespec.c 2007-10-03 01:16:04.000000000 +0100 +++ src/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-06 23:53:34.000000000 +0000 @@ -1534,11 +1534,11 @@ symtab_from_filename (char **argptr, cha file_symtab = lookup_symtab (copy); if (file_symtab == 0) { - if (!have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols ()) - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); if (not_found_ptr) *not_found_ptr = 1; - throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("No source file named %s."), copy); + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, + _("Source file not found in loaded symbols: %s"), + copy); } /* Discard the file name from the arg. */ @@ -1744,13 +1744,11 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs if (msymbol != NULL) return minsym_found (funfirstline, msymbol); - if (!have_full_symbols () && - !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ()) - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); - if (not_found_ptr) *not_found_ptr = 1; - throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy); + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, + _("Function not found in loaded symbols: %s"), + copy); } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 0:42 ` Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves 2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" > notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint > location support? Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed. > if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && > - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? ")) > + !nquery (_("\ > +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? "))) Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward. For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a NOT_FOUND_ERROR? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves 2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus 2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2964 bytes --] Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" >> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint >> location support? > > Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the > breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed. > Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that, is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and do an info breakpoints to see if it got in. If the breakpoint is in a plugin that gets loaded in reaction to some event, its even worse, as I'll have to poll... >> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && >> - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? ")) >> + !nquery (_("\ >> +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? "))) > > Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward. > > For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work > to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a > NOT_FOUND_ERROR? > Yes it works, but do we want both the current error message, and NOT_FOUND_ERROR message that's already there, but not triggered currently, which is the message one usually sees? I guess you mean something like the attached? In IMHO *this* looks awkward: >gdb/gdb.exe gdb-stripped.exe GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"... (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) b main No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command. Function "main" not defined. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 1 (main) pending. (gdb) file gdb/gdb.exe Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe...done. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xe336e8) at ../../gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:28 28 memset (&args, 0, sizeof args); (gdb) info b Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x0040107a in main at ../../gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:28 breakpoint already hit 1 time (gdb) Should one really care if there is no symbol table loaded, as opposed to having symbols for everything else but what one needs? To me, what's important is that the symbol I requested isn't found. With the error out of the way, we'll ask if the user would like to make it pending on a *shared library* load. But, the user may know the symbol isn't from a shared lib (like the example above), get confused, and answer no to the pending query. -- Pedro Alves [-- Attachment #2: pending.diff --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2122 bytes --] 2007-12-07 Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt> * linespec.c (symtab_from_filename): Don't error out early if there are no symbols loaded. (decode_variable): Likewise. --- gdb/linespec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Index: src/gdb/linespec.c =================================================================== --- src.orig/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-07 00:33:10.000000000 +0000 +++ src/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-07 01:39:08.000000000 +0000 @@ -1534,11 +1534,16 @@ symtab_from_filename (char **argptr, cha file_symtab = lookup_symtab (copy); if (file_symtab == 0) { - if (!have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols ()) - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); + int nosyms = !have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols (); + if (not_found_ptr) *not_found_ptr = 1; - throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("No source file named %s."), copy); + + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("\ +%s\ +No source file named %s."), + nosyms ? _("\ +No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\n") : "", copy); } /* Discard the file name from the arg. */ @@ -1727,6 +1732,7 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs struct symtab *sym_symtab; struct minimal_symbol *msymbol; + int nosyms; sym = lookup_symbol (copy, (file_symtab @@ -1744,13 +1750,19 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs if (msymbol != NULL) return minsym_found (funfirstline, msymbol); - if (!have_full_symbols () && - !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ()) - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); - if (not_found_ptr) *not_found_ptr = 1; - throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy); + + nosyms = (!have_full_symbols () + && !have_partial_symbols () + && !have_minimal_symbols ()); + + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, + _("\ +%s\ +Function \"%s\" not defined."), + nosyms ? _("\ +No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\n") : "", copy); } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:05AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a > function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that, > is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and > do an info breakpoints to see if it got in. If the breakpoint > is in a plugin that gets loaded in reaction to some event, its > even worse, as I'll have to poll... Maybe there should be a single message when any number of pending breakpoints are resolved? Anyway, one issue at a time. > >> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && - !nquery ("Make > >> breakpoint pending on future shared library load? ")) > >> + !nquery (_("\ > >> +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? "))) > > Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward. > > For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work > > to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a > > NOT_FOUND_ERROR? > > Yes it works, but do we want both the current error message, > and NOT_FOUND_ERROR message that's already there, but not > triggered currently, which is the message one usually sees? > I guess you mean something like the attached? No, I agree that looks silly. I meant: > - if (!have_full_symbols () && > - !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ()) > - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); > - > if (not_found_ptr) > *not_found_ptr = 1; > + if (!have_full_symbols () && > + !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ()) > + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, > + _("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.")); > throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy); That'll produce: No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 1 (main) pending. Of course that still looks wrong. It's not a shared library load that we're waiting for. Anyone else have concrete suggestions for these messages? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2007-12-08 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: pedro_alves, gdb, lepascal01, gdb-patches > Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:53:56 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, personel personel <lepascal01@yahoo.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> > > That'll produce: > > No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command. > Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y > Breakpoint 1 (main) pending. > > Of course that still looks wrong. It's not a shared library load that > we're waiting for. > > Anyone else have concrete suggestions for these messages? No symbol table is loaded. Perhaps a shared library was not yet loaded, or you need to use the "file" command. Make breakpoint pending on future load of symbol table? (y or [n]) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves 2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vladimir Prus @ 2007-12-07 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches Pedro Alves wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" >>> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint >>> location support? >> >> Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the >> breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed. >> > > Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a > function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that, > is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and > do an info breakpoints to see if it got in. Well, in MI any change of breakpoint should result in a notification -- though it does not do now. I have no idea whatsoever what should CLI do, but it seems to be strange that you have to regularly check if your breakpoint is set -- is GDB *that* buggy? - Volodya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. 2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Korn @ 2007-12-07 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Daniel Jacobowitz', 'Pedro Alves' Cc: gdb, 'personel personel', 'gdb-patches' On 07 December 2007 00:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" >> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint >> location support? > > Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the > breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed. > >> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && >> - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? >> ")) + !nquery (_("\ +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file >> addition? "))) > > Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward. How about "Leave breakpoint pending until symbols can be resolved?" cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-08 10:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20071206182343.GA16137@caradoc.them.org>
[not found] ` <433908.24398.qm@web57701.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <20071206202850.GA27429@caradoc.them.org>
[not found] ` <47586224.CE80C330@dessent.net>
2007-12-07 0:42 ` Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox