* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
[not found] ` <47586224.CE80C330@dessent.net>
@ 2007-12-07 0:42 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb; +Cc: personel personel, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3780 bytes --]
[RFC patch attached -- cc'ed to gdb-patches@]
Brian Dessent wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
>>> (gdb) break libvlc_new
>>> No symbol table is loaded. use the file command
>> Try "set pending on"? Or you may need a newer version of GDB.
>
> I don't think pending being off is the problem, but you do need a more
> recent gdb than what ships with Cygwin. With recent CVS gdb I have had
> success with something like:
>
> gdb VLCTest.exe
> add-shared-symbol-files libvlc.dll
> b libvlc_new
> run
>
> I have always found debugging stripped binaries on Win32 with gdb to be
> somewhat unpleasant. After the first time that the program has run and
> terminates, all the pending breakpoint stuff usually seems to work fine,
> it's just that initially when nothing has loaded yet it does not. So
> that's another workaround, just run the inferior to completion without
> any breakpoints and then start debugging the second run.
>
My opinion is that the pending support should kick in on this case, like
in the attached patch, like so:
> gdb/gdb.exe gdb-stripped.exe
GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) b LoadLibraryW
Function not found in loaded symbols: LoadLibraryW
Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (LoadLibraryW) pending.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb-stripped.exe
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
Breakpoint 1, 0x7c80ae4b in LoadLibraryW () from
/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/kernel32.dll
(gdb)
(Those unconditional "(no debugging symbols found)" in
symbol_file_add_with_addrs_or_offsets seem silly to me.
An idea would be:
if (mainline || from_tty || info_verbose)
printf_filtered (_("(no debugging symbols found)"));
?
)
And also:
>gdb/gdb gdb-stripped.exe
GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) b main
Function not found in loaded symbols: main
Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (main) pending.
(gdb) info b
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y(p) <PENDING> main
(gdb) file gdb/gdb.exe
Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xe336e0) at
../../gdb-server_submit/src/gdb/gdb.c:28
28 memset (&args, 0, sizeof args);
(gdb) info b
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x0040107a in main at
../../gdb-server_submit/src/gdb/gdb.c:28
breakpoint already hit 1 time
(gdb)
I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved"
notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint
location support?
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: pending.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2424 bytes --]
2007-12-07 Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
* breakpoint.c (break_command_1): Update pending breakpoint query
text.
* linespec.c (symtab_from_filename): Don't call error if there are
no symbols loaded. Update message.
(decode_variable): Likewise.
---
gdb/breakpoint.c | 3 ++-
gdb/linespec.c | 14 ++++++--------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/breakpoint.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-12-06 20:53:32.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-12-07 00:07:14.000000000 +0000
@@ -5505,7 +5505,8 @@ break_command_1 (char *arg, int flag, in
/* If pending breakpoint support is auto query and the user
selects no, then simply return the error code. */
if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO &&
- !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? "))
+ !nquery (_("\
+Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? ")))
return e.reason;
/* At this point, either the user was queried about setting
Index: src/gdb/linespec.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/linespec.c 2007-10-03 01:16:04.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-06 23:53:34.000000000 +0000
@@ -1534,11 +1534,11 @@ symtab_from_filename (char **argptr, cha
file_symtab = lookup_symtab (copy);
if (file_symtab == 0)
{
- if (!have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols ())
- error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
if (not_found_ptr)
*not_found_ptr = 1;
- throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("No source file named %s."), copy);
+ throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR,
+ _("Source file not found in loaded symbols: %s"),
+ copy);
}
/* Discard the file name from the arg. */
@@ -1744,13 +1744,11 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs
if (msymbol != NULL)
return minsym_found (funfirstline, msymbol);
- if (!have_full_symbols () &&
- !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ())
- error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
-
if (not_found_ptr)
*not_found_ptr = 1;
- throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy);
+ throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR,
+ _("Function not found in loaded symbols: %s"),
+ copy);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 0:42 ` Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB Pedro Alves
@ 2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved"
> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint
> location support?
Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the
breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed.
> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO &&
> - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? "))
> + !nquery (_("\
> +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? ")))
Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward.
For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work
to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a
NOT_FOUND_ERROR?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2007-12-07 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2964 bytes --]
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved"
>> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint
>> location support?
>
> Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the
> breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed.
>
Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a
function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that,
is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and
do an info breakpoints to see if it got in. If the breakpoint
is in a plugin that gets loaded in reaction to some event, its
even worse, as I'll have to poll...
>> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO &&
>> - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? "))
>> + !nquery (_("\
>> +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? ")))
>
> Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward.
>
> For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work
> to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a
> NOT_FOUND_ERROR?
>
Yes it works, but do we want both the current error message,
and NOT_FOUND_ERROR message that's already there, but not
triggered currently, which is the message one usually sees?
I guess you mean something like the attached?
In IMHO *this* looks awkward:
>gdb/gdb.exe gdb-stripped.exe
GNU gdb 6.7.50.20071206-cvs
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) b main
No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
Function "main" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (main) pending.
(gdb) file gdb/gdb.exe
Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/gdb.exe
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xe336e8) at ../../gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:28
28 memset (&args, 0, sizeof args);
(gdb) info b
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x0040107a in main at ../../gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:28
breakpoint already hit 1 time
(gdb)
Should one really care if there is no symbol table
loaded, as opposed to having symbols for everything else
but what one needs? To me, what's important is that the
symbol I requested isn't found. With the error out of
the way, we'll ask if the user would like to make it
pending on a *shared library* load. But, the user may
know the symbol isn't from a shared lib (like the example
above), get confused, and answer no to the pending query.
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: pending.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2122 bytes --]
2007-12-07 Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
* linespec.c (symtab_from_filename): Don't error out early if
there are no symbols loaded.
(decode_variable): Likewise.
---
gdb/linespec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/linespec.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-07 00:33:10.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/linespec.c 2007-12-07 01:39:08.000000000 +0000
@@ -1534,11 +1534,16 @@ symtab_from_filename (char **argptr, cha
file_symtab = lookup_symtab (copy);
if (file_symtab == 0)
{
- if (!have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols ())
- error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
+ int nosyms = !have_full_symbols () && !have_partial_symbols ();
+
if (not_found_ptr)
*not_found_ptr = 1;
- throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("No source file named %s."), copy);
+
+ throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("\
+%s\
+No source file named %s."),
+ nosyms ? _("\
+No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\n") : "", copy);
}
/* Discard the file name from the arg. */
@@ -1727,6 +1732,7 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs
struct symtab *sym_symtab;
struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
+ int nosyms;
sym = lookup_symbol (copy,
(file_symtab
@@ -1744,13 +1750,19 @@ decode_variable (char *copy, int funfirs
if (msymbol != NULL)
return minsym_found (funfirstline, msymbol);
- if (!have_full_symbols () &&
- !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ())
- error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
-
if (not_found_ptr)
*not_found_ptr = 1;
- throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy);
+
+ nosyms = (!have_full_symbols ()
+ && !have_partial_symbols ()
+ && !have_minimal_symbols ());
+
+ throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR,
+ _("\
+%s\
+Function \"%s\" not defined."),
+ nosyms ? _("\
+No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\n") : "", copy);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-12-07 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb, personel personel, gdb-patches
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:05AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a
> function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that,
> is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and
> do an info breakpoints to see if it got in. If the breakpoint
> is in a plugin that gets loaded in reaction to some event, its
> even worse, as I'll have to poll...
Maybe there should be a single message when any number of pending
breakpoints are resolved? Anyway, one issue at a time.
> >> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && - !nquery ("Make
> >> breakpoint pending on future shared library load? "))
> >> + !nquery (_("\
> >> +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? ")))
> > Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward.
> > For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work
> > to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a
> > NOT_FOUND_ERROR?
>
> Yes it works, but do we want both the current error message,
> and NOT_FOUND_ERROR message that's already there, but not
> triggered currently, which is the message one usually sees?
> I guess you mean something like the attached?
No, I agree that looks silly. I meant:
> - if (!have_full_symbols () &&
> - !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ())
> - error (_("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
> -
> if (not_found_ptr)
> *not_found_ptr = 1;
> + if (!have_full_symbols () &&
> + !have_partial_symbols () && !have_minimal_symbols ())
> + throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR,
> + _("No symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command."));
> throw_error (NOT_FOUND_ERROR, _("Function \"%s\" not defined."), copy);
That'll produce:
No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (main) pending.
Of course that still looks wrong. It's not a shared library load that
we're waiting for.
Anyone else have concrete suggestions for these messages?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Prus @ 2007-12-07 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Pedro Alves wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved"
>>> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint
>>> location support?
>>
>> Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the
>> breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed.
>>
>
> Humm, I found it useful, as in "ok, the breakpoint I set in a
> function that will only trigger after I do this, that, and that,
> is correctly set". Now, I have to interrupt the inferior and
> do an info breakpoints to see if it got in.
Well, in MI any change of breakpoint should result in a notification --
though it does not do now.
I have no idea whatsoever what should CLI do, but it seems to be strange
that you have to regularly check if your breakpoint is set -- is GDB
*that* buggy?
- Volodya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Korn @ 2007-12-07 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Daniel Jacobowitz', 'Pedro Alves'
Cc: gdb, 'personel personel', 'gdb-patches'
On 07 December 2007 00:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved"
>> notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint
>> location support?
>
> Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the
> breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed.
>
>> if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO &&
>> - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load?
>> ")) + !nquery (_("\ +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol
file
>> addition? ")))
>
> Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward.
How about
"Leave breakpoint pending until symbols can be resolved?"
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB.
2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2007-12-08 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: pedro_alves, gdb, lepascal01, gdb-patches
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:53:56 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, personel personel <lepascal01@yahoo.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> That'll produce:
>
> No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
> Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
> Breakpoint 1 (main) pending.
>
> Of course that still looks wrong. It's not a shared library load that
> we're waiting for.
>
> Anyone else have concrete suggestions for these messages?
No symbol table is loaded. Perhaps a shared library was not yet
loaded, or you need to use the "file" command.
Make breakpoint pending on future load of symbol table? (y or [n])
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-08 10:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20071206182343.GA16137@caradoc.them.org>
[not found] ` <433908.24398.qm@web57701.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <20071206202850.GA27429@caradoc.them.org>
[not found] ` <47586224.CE80C330@dessent.net>
2007-12-07 0:42 ` Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-07 6:20 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-07 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-08 11:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-12-07 14:09 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-12-07 21:24 ` Dave Korn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox