Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Move DJGPP/go32 bits to their own tdep file
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ad7b9b-e1e8-308b-a24d-b1c7a5425777@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <837f2pk7kq.fsf@gnu.org>

On 04/12/2017 03:45 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> It's fine with me if you decide to make only that change.  I just
> think that if you had this difficulty with go32 bits, someone else
> might have the same difficulty with SVR4 bits.  That's why I wrote
> what I wrote.

Hmm, actually, the SVR4 bits are likely useless by now?  It seems to me
that the only way to activate them is to manually do "set osabi SVR4".
At least according to a grep by GDB_OSABI_SVR4:

 defs.h:  GDB_OSABI_SVR4,
 i386-tdep.c:  gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_i386, 0, GDB_OSABI_SVR4,

I.e., unlike most other ports, there's no osabi sniffer to auto-detect
SVR4.

Grepping for i386_svr4_init_abi, we see that Solaris is the only other
SVR4-like port that reuses the function:

 i386-tdep.c:4474:i386_svr4_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
 i386-tdep.c:9093:                         i386_svr4_init_abi);
 i386-tdep.h:433:extern void i386_svr4_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info, struct gdbarch *);
 i386-sol2-tdep.c:109:  i386_svr4_init_abi (info, gdbarch);

So maybe we should drop GDB_OSABI_SVR4, and inline/move the i386_svr4_init_abi
function to i386-sol2-tdep.c.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 13:31 Pedro Alves
2017-04-12 13:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-04-12 14:07   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-12 14:26     ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-12 14:45       ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-04-12 14:57         ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-04-12 15:32           ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-12 14:42     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-04-12 14:46       ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-12 14:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-04-12 15:02           ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43ad7b9b-e1e8-308b-a24d-b1c7a5425777@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox