From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4146070D.3040104@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c499c9$Blat.v2.2.2$deebfb60@zahav.net.il>
>>Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:27:59 -0400
>>> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>>> Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>>>
>>> I've committed this part of my change:
>
>
> Great! So you've gone out and committed a patch over an objection of
> a core maintainer who worked quite a bit on the releated code.
No. The changes that in anyway formalize the deprecation of all this:
cagney@nettle$ frep TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
config/i386/nm-i386sco5.h:56:#define TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
config/i386/nm-i386sol2.h:25:#define TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
config/mips/nm-irix5.h:25:#define TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
config/sparc/nm-sol2.h:36:#define TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
doc/gdbint.texinfo:403:@findex TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
doc/gdbint.texinfo:404:@item TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
doc/gdbint.texinfo:3836:@item TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
i386v-nat.c:45:#ifdef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
i386v-nat.c:107:#ifdef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
i386v-nat.c:273:#endif /* TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS */
procfs.c:2878:#if !defined (TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS)
procfs.c:5282:#ifndef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
and that you have so stridently objected to, are still all sitting on
the table.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-13 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-05 13:59 Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 5:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-06 14:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-07 21:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 14:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 3:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 12:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-12 16:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-12 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 14:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-13 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 20:48 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-09-15 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-15 16:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-16 10:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4146070D.3040104@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox