From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c49bdb$Blat.v2.2.2$5bc692e0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4148692E.3000304@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:09:18 -0400)
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:09:18 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> > That doesn't matter: you still did something unilaterally instead of
> > first asking if that is okay with me and others.
>
> Can you please provide a technical objection for the patch I committed.
My point was procedural, not technical.
This discussion identified a disagreement. When there is a
disagreement, it is customary to ask for explicit approval to
compromise solutions before implementing them, even if you are sure
such an approval will be given. If nothing else, this encourages
cooperation and the will to reach an agreement in the future.
Unilateral actions, OTOH, have the reverse effect.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-05 13:59 Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 5:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-06 14:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-07 21:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 14:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 3:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 12:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-12 16:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-12 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 14:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-13 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 20:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-15 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-15 16:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-16 10:53 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c49bdb$Blat.v2.2.2$5bc692e0@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox