From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c49af4$Blat.v2.2.2$56b4be40@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4146070D.3040104@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:46:05 -0400)
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:46:05 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> > Great! So you've gone out and committed a patch over an objection of
> > a core maintainer who worked quite a bit on the releated code.
>
> No. The changes that in anyway formalize the deprecation of all this:
> [...]
> and that you have so stridently objected to, are still all sitting on
> the table.
That doesn't matter: you still did something unilaterally instead of
first asking if that is okay with me and others.
No matter how much you are annoyed by failing to get an agreement, it
doesn't mean you should do things unilaterally. There's nothing
wrong, in principle, in the fact that I object to something ``so
stridently''; others, yourself included, are known to use the same
practices on many occasions. AFIR, no one has as yet committed a
patch over your objections in such a situation. I request that you do
the same here and in similar cases in the future.
TIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-15 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-05 13:59 Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 5:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-06 14:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-06 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-07 21:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 14:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-08 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-08 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 3:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-09 12:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-09 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-12 16:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-12 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 14:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-13 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-13 20:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-15 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-09-15 16:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-16 10:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c49af4$Blat.v2.2.2$56b4be40@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox