Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa/hppa] Use frame pointer for unwinding
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40A8D692.7080902@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040516170257.GM566@tausq.org>

26. alloca_frame (bit 35): This bit is set if alloca() is used and has 
been inlined. This indicates gr3 or gr4 may contain the previous sp 
value.

For some reason this latter flag is named differently in the gdb sources
compared to what's in the documentation.
(feel free to fix)

Anyway, I spoke with Dave Anglin (hppa gcc maintainer) about this. The
problem is that currently gcc/binutils does not correctly implement the
alloca_frame bit. The frame pointer is maintained in the case of a
variable-sized frame, but there is no flag set in the unwind record, and
the frame layout is slightly different compared to the HP compiler. It's
one of the things that should be fixed in gcc eventually. Also Dave has
observed that the Save_SP bit is set only for gcc; with the HP compiler
this is not set.  Finally, with the HP compiler the frame pointer can 
be maintained either in r3 or r4. It's not clear yet how this works. 
Some more experimentation/disassembling HP code is required :-( 
I will add some comments to the code about this situation.
Is there a GCC bug report for this?

(more followups to come)

Andrew




  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-17 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-16  2:07 Randolph Chung
2004-05-16 10:36 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-16 15:36   ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-16 16:22     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-16 16:42       ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-16 16:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-16 17:03   ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-17  0:13     ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-17  2:34       ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-17 15:23         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-17 16:01           ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-17 17:27             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-17 15:13     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-05-17 16:13 John David Anglin
2004-05-17 17:14 John David Anglin
2004-05-17 17:28 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-17 17:54   ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40A8D692.7080902@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox