From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407E67EA.80701@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040414144607.GA5700@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> I think you should make this change unconditionally - and flush the
> entire frame cache.
Pardon my ignorance, but why should the entire frame cache be flushed,
instead of just invalidating the current set of registers? Is it
because frame pointer/return address registers (or something else
affecting other frames) might change?
> I'm not sure whether it should be in the generic
> code that writes a register or the user-level code triggered by set
> $reg = val, though.
So either something like
target_register_write (regno)
where the target-specific code can do whatever it wants (presumably
calling flush_cached_frames), or a more specialized function
target_flush_register_cache_on_register_write (regno)
and then have whatever calls that function do the actual frame cache
flushing.
> Andrew convinced me that the performance cost associated with this
> would be small in practice.
So, it's not worth the trouble implementing a more fine-grained solution
like "refetch only the modified register".
--
Orjan Friberg
Axis Communications
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 11:44 Orjan Friberg
2004-04-14 14:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-14 16:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-15 10:46 ` Orjan Friberg [this message]
2004-04-15 11:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-15 15:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-16 12:51 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-16 14:54 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 19:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-19 14:13 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-21 16:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-22 13:58 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 14:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-23 11:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-24 0:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-23 15:20 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-23 17:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-26 9:41 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-24 0:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-24 8:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-28 16:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-28 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-29 8:09 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-29 17:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-30 7:39 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-26 9:50 ` Orjan Friberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407E67EA.80701@axis.com \
--to=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox