* Daniel, the branch is NOT unfrozen
@ 2004-02-29 3:03 Andrew Cagney
2004-02-29 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-02-29 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz, gdb-patches
It's not even announced!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Daniel, the branch is NOT unfrozen
2004-02-29 3:03 Daniel, the branch is NOT unfrozen Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-02-29 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-02-29 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:03:03PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> It's not even announced!
I apologize. I considered an "FYI" patch adding the branch to
ChangeLogs to constitute an announcement, and I don't recall any past
tradition of branches beginning frozen. Should I revert my patches or
will that just get in your way more?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-29 3:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-29 3:03 Daniel, the branch is NOT unfrozen Andrew Cagney
2004-02-29 3:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox