From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26042 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2004 03:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26034 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2004 03:06:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Feb 2004 03:06:45 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AxHHx-0001bB-Ip; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:06:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Daniel, the branch is NOT unfrozen Message-ID: <20040229030645.GA6116@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <40415667.5020504@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40415667.5020504@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:03:03PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > It's not even announced! I apologize. I considered an "FYI" patch adding the branch to ChangeLogs to constitute an announcement, and I don't recall any past tradition of branches beginning frozen. Should I revert my patches or will that just get in your way more? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer