Re: RFA (?) Annotate Level 3 patch

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

>  > Can you post a log with/with-out this patch to illustrate what's 
>  > happening.  You're right - emacs should see "stopped" first but there 
>  > might be a better long-term way to do this.
>  > 
>  > I suspect this will mean playing with the print-stop-reason code.
> 
> Moving annotate_stopped to the start of normal_stop seems to do the right
> thing. It might be bad practice, however, to break existing functionality so a
> better solution might be to create a new annotation there - aargh! - called
> stopping, say, instead. However, remember that I will have reduced my initial
> set of 25 annotations to 14. They would be:
> 
> 
>     pre-prompt            prompt            post-prompt
>     commands              overload-choice   query
>     prompt-for-continue   source            starting
>     exited                signalled         signal
>     stopped
> 
>     and stopping

Could stopped be zapped from annotate level-3 then?

Andrew