From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19339 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 23:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19325 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2004 23:40:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2004 23:40:34 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096AA2B92; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:40:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40296BF1.7060900@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA (?) Annotate Level 3 patch References: <16176.3560.65649.7079@nick.uklinux.net> <4016A245.6030001@gnu.org> <16414.51421.622553.831432@nick.uklinux.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 > > Can you post a log with/with-out this patch to illustrate what's > > happening. You're right - emacs should see "stopped" first but there > > might be a better long-term way to do this. > > > > I suspect this will mean playing with the print-stop-reason code. > > Moving annotate_stopped to the start of normal_stop seems to do the right > thing. It might be bad practice, however, to break existing functionality so a > better solution might be to create a new annotation there - aargh! - called > stopping, say, instead. However, remember that I will have reduced my initial > set of 25 annotations to 14. They would be: > > > pre-prompt prompt post-prompt > commands overload-choice query > prompt-for-continue source starting > exited signalled signal > stopped > > and stopping Could stopped be zapped from annotate level-3 then? Andrew