From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>, Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Rogerio Alves <rogealve@br.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb fix for catch-syscall.exp
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:07:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bfb697f-c1e9-618a-03bb-8ea2da5db052@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d51616392553dd308672f65f18909ebf0513fc0.camel@us.ibm.com>
On 2021-11-19 19:27, Carl Love wrote:
> Simon:
>
> On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 13:10 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> This patch causes this failure regression on Ubuntu 20.04, amd64:
>>
>> FAIL: gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp: execve: continue to main
>>
>> From gdb.log:
>>
>> 615 continue^M
>> 616 Continuing.^M
>> 617 process 2022222 is executing new program:
>> /home/smarchi/build/binutils-
>> gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/catch-syscall/catch-syscall^M
>> 618 ^M
>> 619 Catchpoint 18 (returned from syscall execve), 0x00007ffff7fd0100
>> in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2^M
>> 620 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp: execve: continue to main
>>
>
> Interesting. I understood that the execve call would not return to the
> caller except in the case of an error. Not sure why it behaves
> differently on amd64 versus Power and Intel? Let me take a look and
> see if I can create a fix with a test multiple to cover both cases.
>
> Thanks for letting me know.
>
> Carl
>
Did you manage to reproduce, or do you need more data from me?
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-17 23:30 Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-18 15:23 ` Tom Tromey
2021-11-18 18:10 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-20 0:27 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 1:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-11-22 18:16 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 17:01 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-23 20:34 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-23 22:34 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-24 17:46 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-24 17:51 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-24 1:15 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-24 19:29 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-29 16:46 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-02 16:32 ` Ping " Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-10 18:36 ` Simon Marchi
2021-12-10 19:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-11 0:21 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bfb697f-c1e9-618a-03bb-8ea2da5db052@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rogealve@br.ibm.com \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox