From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Rogerio Alves <rogealve@br.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gdb fix for catch-syscall.exp
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:30:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b8e450b9fb4f4bec97a6bfbe6e6a4816be780ee.camel@us.ibm.com> (raw)
GDB maintainers:
The following patch fixes three test failures and an expect error. The
expect error ERROR: can't read "arch1": no such variable is the result
of the if/else statement in proc test_catch_syscall_multi_arch not
matching the power platform. The power platform, starting with Power
8, has "le" in the platform string to indicate a Little Endian system.
The current expect string doesn't match the "le" in the name.
The other three failures are the result of the execve instruction that
starts executing the new program. The expect script is looking for the
return from the execve command which doesn't occur since execve
replaces the current process image.
The patch was tested on a Power 10 LE system with no regressions.
Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline. Thanks.
Carl
-------------------------------------------------------------------
gdb fix for catch-syscall.exp
Remove check_continue "execve" from Proc test_catch_syscall_execve.
The check_continue proceedure checs that the command, execve, starts and
checks for the return from the command. The execve command starts a new
program and thus the return from the command causing the test to fail.
The call to proc check_continue "execve" is removed and replaced with
just the call to check_call_to_syscall "execve" to verify the command
executed. The next test in proc test_catch_syscall_execve verifies that
the new program started and hit the break point in main.
Update the check for the PowerPC architecture. Power Little Endian systems
include "le" in the name. The istarget "power64-*-linux*" check fails to
match LE sytems. The expected string is updated to capture both Big Endian
and Little Endian systems. Power 10 LE istarget prints as:
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
This patch fixes three failures and the error:
ERROR: can't read "arch1": no such variable
Patch tested on Power 10 ppc64le GNU/Linux platform.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
index 811a92b0aea..8b496712df5 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
@@ -348,7 +348,9 @@ proc test_catch_syscall_execve {} {
# Check for entry/return across the execve, making sure that the
# syscall_state isn't lost when turning into a new process.
insert_catch_syscall_with_arg "execve"
- check_continue "execve"
+
+ # check that the execve is called
+ check_call_to_syscall "execve"
# Continue to main so extended-remote can read files as needed.
# (Otherwise that "Reading" output confuses gdb_continue_to_end.)
@@ -550,7 +552,7 @@ proc test_catch_syscall_multi_arch {} {
set syscall2_name "write"
set syscall_number 1
} elseif { [istarget "powerpc-*-linux*"] \
- || [istarget "powerpc64-*-linux*"] } {
+ || [istarget "powerpc64*-linux*"] } {
set arch1 "powerpc:common"
set arch2 "powerpc:common64"
set syscall1_name "openat"
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-17 23:30 Carl Love via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-11-18 15:23 ` Tom Tromey
2021-11-18 18:10 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-20 0:27 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 1:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 18:16 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-22 17:01 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-23 20:34 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-23 22:34 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-24 17:46 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-24 17:51 ` John Baldwin
2021-11-24 1:15 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-11-24 19:29 ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-29 16:46 ` Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-02 16:32 ` Ping " Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-10 18:36 ` Simon Marchi
2021-12-10 19:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Carl Love via Gdb-patches
2021-12-11 0:21 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b8e450b9fb4f4bec97a6bfbe6e6a4816be780ee.camel@us.ibm.com \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rogealve@br.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox