Re: [RFA] sh-sim: restructure expand_opcode.

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Joern Rennecke wrote:
>>Let's come back to this after the holidays.  Speaking of which,
>>by the time you reply, I will be gone for the holidays, and not
>>return until the new year.  If we have acheived convergence on
>>this piece of code, would you mind checking it in?
> 
> 
> patch complains about an out-of-sync patch, and I have no time this year to
> investigate.
> So I suppose the patch will need to wait for you to come back.  AFAI
> understand the copyright provisions, if you want to add a copyright notice
> for your patch (gencode.c currently says no copyright / provided by Cygnus),
> that whould still be supposed to read 2003, as this is when the code was
> written.

Committed.  We can return to the copyright issue.
I'll have the next patch ready shortly.

> 
> Hmmm... I wonder: since sim is considered to be part of gdb, does that mean
> that blanket copyright assignments to the fsf covering gdb result(ed) in
> any patches to gencode.c, which have been written by people working with
> such an assignment in place, to be assigned to the FSF?  If that is the case,
> a number of past patches would also need Copyright notices for FSF
> Copyright.
> We'll probably have to make up a new style (unless one to cover this
> situation already exists), something like like: the version up to <date>
> was placed by Cygnus into the public domain, while later modifications are
> Copyright FSF (list of years).
>