From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9617 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 01:06:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9577 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 01:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 01:06:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i06163A19131 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:06:03 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i06162M20399; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:06:02 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i06160O04595; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:06:01 -0800 Message-ID: <3FFA09F8.2000306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 01:06:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joern Rennecke CC: andrew.stubbs@superh.com, joern.rennecke@superh.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] sh-sim: restructure expand_opcode. References: <200312240433.hBO4X0x3001484@meolyon.local> In-Reply-To: <200312240433.hBO4X0x3001484@meolyon.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 Joern Rennecke wrote: >>Let's come back to this after the holidays. Speaking of which, >>by the time you reply, I will be gone for the holidays, and not >>return until the new year. If we have acheived convergence on >>this piece of code, would you mind checking it in? > > > patch complains about an out-of-sync patch, and I have no time this year to > investigate. > So I suppose the patch will need to wait for you to come back. AFAI > understand the copyright provisions, if you want to add a copyright notice > for your patch (gencode.c currently says no copyright / provided by Cygnus), > that whould still be supposed to read 2003, as this is when the code was > written. Committed. We can return to the copyright issue. I'll have the next patch ready shortly. > > Hmmm... I wonder: since sim is considered to be part of gdb, does that mean > that blanket copyright assignments to the fsf covering gdb result(ed) in > any patches to gencode.c, which have been written by people working with > such an assignment in place, to be assigned to the FSF? If that is the case, > a number of past patches would also need Copyright notices for FSF > Copyright. > We'll probably have to make up a new style (unless one to cover this > situation already exists), something like like: the version up to > was placed by Cygnus into the public domain, while later modifications are > Copyright FSF (list of years). >