Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Ada's throw/catch; Was: [RFC] Unexpected automatic language switch - get_frame_language()
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD766D9.5080908@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031210181030.GI1296@gnat.com>

> Before I start the discussion and maybe cause us to change our
> implementation, what is the feeling of the GDB maintainers in
> general. Suppose for instance that we would submit our current
> implementation for inclusion, would it be approved, or refused?
> Right now, here is our change against breakpoint.c relevant to this
> functionality:

Given that GDB already has an established generic documented and 
"working" throw/catch mechanism, I'm not sure that there are advantages 
to be had in adding a second.  While Act would certainly benefit, I 
don't know that the same can be argued for GDB as a whole.

Andrew



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-10 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-05 22:48 Joel Brobecker
2003-12-05 23:57 ` Michael Snyder
2003-12-06  0:18   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-06  0:28     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-10  1:50       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 16:14         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-10 17:42           ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-06  0:42     ` Michael Snyder
2003-12-10 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 18:10   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 18:20     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 19:16       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 19:18         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 18:33     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-12-10 19:04       ` Ada's throw/catch; Was: " Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FD766D9.5080908@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox