From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unexpected automatic language switch - get_frame_language()
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD11B60.2040008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031205224807.GE716@gnat.com>
Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
> So we determine the language by looking up the symtab associated to
> the given frame pc. Unfortunately, we were not very lucky in our case
> because the call instruction was the last instruction of the function.
> And because get_frame_pc actually gives a return address (except for
> the bottom frame), the pc return is actually pointing to a different
> function. And this is where we're not lucky for the second time, because
> the next function is in a different unit written in a different
> language!
Sounds kinda like a debugging-optimized-code problem. Your function
is tail-return optimized -- doesn't really return. That's outside
the expected API.
I think you have to do "special" things for non-returning functions.
I've seen the same sort of thing for eg. _exit.
[...]
>
> So I think the correct way of doing this is to use a decremented PC
> for any frame but the bottom one.
I think that's fixing the wrong problem. And it's not really portable.
[...]
> PS: I couldn't reduce the testcase more, the test is too sensitive
> to code generation and placement...
That's generally a good sign of an optimization problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-05 22:48 Joel Brobecker
2003-12-05 23:57 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2003-12-06 0:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-06 0:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-10 1:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-10 17:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-06 0:42 ` Michael Snyder
2003-12-10 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 18:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 19:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-10 19:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-10 18:33 ` Ada's throw/catch; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2003-12-10 19:04 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FD11B60.2040008@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox