From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frv-tdep.c: Stop backtraces in entry func, not entry file
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8DCC97.7000603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F8C70CE.5020504@gnu.org>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> An FR-V user reported being unable to see useful backtraces when
>> debugging functions inside the entry file. This patch fixes that
>> problem. I think there's a problem with inside_entry_func() itself,
>> but that's a separate issue. (If you are in the entry file,
>> backtraces don't stop at the entry func - they attempt to continue
>> beyond, but they do stop shortly thereafter.)
>
>
> What happens if that test is removed?
>
> I believe the below test has its origins in a d10v hack to get around
> what was then a broken back-trace-past-main problem. The problems been
> fixed, but unfortunatly, the original hack keeps turning up.
Checking for the entry file/function? Oh, it's older than that...
>> Kevin
>>
>> * frv-tdep.c (frv_frame_this_id): Call inside_entry_func()
>> instead of deprecated_inside_entry_file().
>>
>> Index: frv-tdep.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/frv-tdep.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.54
>> diff -u -p -r1.54 frv-tdep.c
>> --- frv-tdep.c 14 Oct 2003 00:30:27 -0000 1.54
>> +++ frv-tdep.c 14 Oct 2003 20:40:18 -0000
>> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ frv_frame_this_id (struct frame_info *ne
>>
>> /* This is meant to halt the backtrace at "_start". Make sure we
>> don't halt it at a generic dummy frame. */
>> - if (deprecated_inside_entry_file (func))
>> + if (inside_entry_func (func))
>> return;
>>
>> /* Check if the stack is empty. */
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-15 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-14 20:51 Kevin Buettner
2003-10-14 21:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-15 22:39 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2003-10-16 0:07 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-16 1:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-16 3:31 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-16 4:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-20 23:57 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F8DCC97.7000603@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox