* Introspect remote protocol spec
@ 2003-06-25 21:40 Michael Snyder
2003-06-26 0:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-26 1:03 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2003-06-25 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi all,
I just went looking for the remote protocol spec for Introspect,
which used to be in the gdb manual along with the rest of the
remote protocol spec, and it doesn't seem to be there any more.
Did this get lost? Was it removed on purpose? Where can it
be found now?
Thanks,
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Introspect remote protocol spec
2003-06-25 21:40 Introspect remote protocol spec Michael Snyder
@ 2003-06-26 0:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-26 1:00 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-26 1:03 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-06-26 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:34:04PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just went looking for the remote protocol spec for Introspect,
> which used to be in the gdb manual along with the rest of the
> remote protocol spec, and it doesn't seem to be there any more.
>
> Did this get lost? Was it removed on purpose? Where can it
> be found now?
I don't think it ever was there - if you mean the bytecode language,
that just got moved into an appendix last week, but the rest of the
protocol I've never seen.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Introspect remote protocol spec
2003-06-26 0:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-06-26 1:00 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2003-06-26 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:34:04PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I just went looking for the remote protocol spec for Introspect,
>>which used to be in the gdb manual along with the rest of the
>>remote protocol spec, and it doesn't seem to be there any more.
>>
>>Did this get lost? Was it removed on purpose? Where can it
>>be found now?
>
>
> I don't think it ever was there - if you mean the bytecode language,
> that just got moved into an appendix last week, but the rest of the
> protocol I've never seen.
No, I mean the protocol for defining a tracepoint, fetching the results,
etc. I'm sure I added it to the rest of the protocol doc somewhere --
if not in gdb.texinfo, then maybe in remote.c (before it got yanked
out of there).
It ought to be publicly available. Gotta find what happened to it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Introspect remote protocol spec
2003-06-25 21:40 Introspect remote protocol spec Michael Snyder
2003-06-26 0:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-06-26 1:03 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-06-26 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Hi all,
>
> I just went looking for the remote protocol spec for Introspect,
> which used to be in the gdb manual along with the rest of the
> remote protocol spec, and it doesn't seem to be there any more.
Was it ever there? I see the byte code stuff but not the protocol side?
> Did this get lost? Was it removed on purpose? Where can it
> be found now?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-26 1:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-25 21:40 Introspect remote protocol spec Michael Snyder
2003-06-26 0:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-26 1:00 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-26 1:03 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox