From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2003 01:00:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3503 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2003 23:01:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2003 23:01:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5PN1WH21945 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:01:32 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5PN1VS05011; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:01:31 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5PN1UK01487; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:01:30 -0700 Message-ID: <3EFA29CA.9090009@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:00:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Introspect remote protocol spec References: <3EF9F92C.9030705@redhat.com> <20030625215533.GB32205@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00780.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:34:04PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I just went looking for the remote protocol spec for Introspect, >>which used to be in the gdb manual along with the rest of the >>remote protocol spec, and it doesn't seem to be there any more. >> >>Did this get lost? Was it removed on purpose? Where can it >>be found now? > > > I don't think it ever was there - if you mean the bytecode language, > that just got moved into an appendix last week, but the rest of the > protocol I've never seen. No, I mean the protocol for defining a tracepoint, fetching the results, etc. I'm sure I added it to the rest of the protocol doc somewhere -- if not in gdb.texinfo, then maybe in remote.c (before it got yanked out of there). It ought to be publicly available. Gotta find what happened to it.