Re: [RFA/TESTSUITE] build schedlock.c on 64-bit platforms

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:12:28AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> >  > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 05:20:19PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > I was getting warnings when compiling the test on 64-bit because of the casts.
> >  > >
> >
> >  >
> >  > Sigh, I was just sloppy writing this one.   Does it work if you pass
> >  > &args[i] instead of messing with my_number?  That's a little more
> >  > portable.
> >  >
> >
> > Ok, how about this? But now get_current_thread in schedlock.exp
> > doesn't work, because the output has changed. I am not sure I
> > understand what it should be doing now. There is no way to get the
> > thread number from the backtraces.
> 
> Oh, you're right - sorry for the wild goose chase.  I think your
> previous patch with the cast to long is OK then.  The test isn't
> terribly portable but it should be portable enough for our use.

Why don't you just declare 'i' a long and be done with it?


> > Index: schedlock.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.2
> > diff -u -p -r1.2 schedlock.c
> > --- schedlock.c       23 Oct 2002 03:22:56 -0000      1.2
> > +++ schedlock.c       10 Apr 2003 14:00:41 -0000
> > @@ -18,19 +18,21 @@ int main() {
> >      for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
> >        {
> >       args[i] = 1;
> > -     res = pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, thread_function, (void *)i);
> > +     res = pthread_create(&threads[i],
> > +                          NULL,
> > +                          thread_function,
> > +                          (void *) &args[i]);
> >        }
> >
> >      /* schedlock.exp: last thread start.  */
> >      args[i] = 1;
> > -    thread_function ((void *) i);
> > +    thread_function ((void *) &args[i]);
> >
> >      exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
> >  }
> >
> >  void *thread_function(void *arg) {
> > -    int my_number = (int) arg;
> > -    int *myp = &args[my_number];
> > +    int *myp = (int *)arg;
> >
> >      /* Don't run forever.  Run just short of it :)  */
> >      while (*myp > 0)
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer