From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [RFA] Dummy frames on x86-64
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E67CEC8.9040301@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E67ABDD.4090401@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 500 bytes --]
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> +static void
>> +x86_64_save_dummy_frame_tos (CORE_ADDR sp)
>> +{
>> + /* We must add the size of the return address that is already
>> + put on the stack. */
>> + generic_save_dummy_frame_tos (sp + sizeof(CORE_ADDR));
>
> Yes, but use TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_{code/data}_ptr).
Great, thanks for your help!
Can I commit the attached patch to mainline, please?
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz
[-- Attachment #2: dummy-unwind-1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1561 bytes --]
2002-03-06 Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
* x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_save_dummy_frame_tos)
(x86_64_unwind_dummy_id): New functions.
(x86_64_init_abi): Register these two new functions.
Index: x86-64-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -p -r1.51 x86-64-tdep.c
--- x86-64-tdep.c 2 Mar 2003 04:02:25 -0000 1.51
+++ x86-64-tdep.c 6 Mar 2003 22:38:14 -0000
@@ -913,6 +913,26 @@ x86_64_breakpoint_from_pc (CORE_ADDR *pc
return breakpoint;
}
+static void
+x86_64_save_dummy_frame_tos (CORE_ADDR sp)
+{
+ /* We must add the size of the return address that is already
+ put on the stack. */
+ generic_save_dummy_frame_tos (sp +
+ TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_func_ptr));
+}
+
+static struct frame_id
+x86_64_unwind_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *frame)
+{
+ struct frame_id id;
+
+ id.pc = frame_pc_unwind (frame);
+ frame_unwind_unsigned_register (frame, SP_REGNUM, &id.base);
+
+ return id;
+}
+
void
x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
@@ -1023,6 +1043,10 @@ x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info inf
since all supported x86-64 targets are ELF, but that might change
in the future. */
set_gdbarch_in_solib_call_trampoline (gdbarch, in_plt_section);
+
+ /* Dummy frame helper functions. */
+ set_gdbarch_save_dummy_frame_tos (gdbarch, x86_64_save_dummy_frame_tos);
+ set_gdbarch_unwind_dummy_id (gdbarch, x86_64_unwind_dummy_id);
}
void
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-06 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 20:54 [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame Andrew Cagney
2003-01-27 21:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-10 23:36 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-11 16:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-18 11:21 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-19 13:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 16:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 16:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 18:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 20:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 20:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-25 16:24 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 19:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 21:00 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 21:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-26 8:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-27 18:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28 13:02 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-28 15:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-05 17:38 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-05 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 16:00 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-06 20:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 22:42 ` Michal Ludvig [this message]
2003-03-07 14:50 ` [RFA] Dummy frames on x86-64 Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 22:41 ` [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E67CEC8.9040301@suse.cz \
--to=mludvig@suse.cz \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox